Understanding and Applying Newton's Law of Cooling

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Newton's Law of Cooling, which states that the rate of temperature change of an object is proportional to the temperature difference between the object and its surroundings, expressed mathematically as \(\frac{dT}{dt} = -k(T - \hat{T})\). Participants demonstrated the derivation of the equation \(\frac{d\theta}{dt} = -k\theta\) and provided the general solution \(\theta(t) = Ce^{-kt}\). The calculations for specific values of \(\theta(3)\) were confirmed to yield 27, validating the approach taken by the participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and logarithms
  • Knowledge of Newton's Law of Cooling
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of solutions for first-order linear differential equations
  • Explore applications of Newton's Law of Cooling in real-world scenarios
  • Learn about the implications of temperature differentials in thermodynamics
  • Investigate numerical methods for solving differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics or mathematics, educators teaching thermodynamics, and professionals involved in heat transfer analysis will benefit from this discussion.

vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Newton's law of cooling says that the rate at which the emperature of any object changes is proportional to the temperature difference between the object and its surroundings. So if the temperature of the object is T, and its surroundings are at a constant temperature \hat{T}

\frac{dT}{dt} = -k(T - \hat{T})

a) let \theta = T - \hat{T}, Show that \frac{d\theta}{dt} = -k\theta and hence write down the general solution for \theta(t)

b) given \theta(0) = 64 and \theta(2) = 36, find \theta(3)

The Attempt at a Solution


a)

\frac{d\theta}{dt} = -k\theta

\int \frac{d\theta}{dt} = \int -k\theta

re arranging
\int \frac{d\theta}{\theta} = \int -k dt

and integrating
ln(\theta) = -k t + C
(I think I add a + C?)

exponentiating both sides
eln(\theta) = e^{-kt +c} = Ce^{-kt}
though I'm not sure why the C goes out to the front, or why it is being multiplied by C

simplifying gives the solution
\theta(t) = Ce^{-kt}

b)

\theta(0) = Ce^{-k * 0} = 64

since e^{-k * 0} = e^0 = 1
that makes
C*1 = 64
so C = 64

now
\theta(2) = 36
so

64*e^{-k * 2} = 36

e^{-k * 2} = \frac{36}{64}

taking the logarithim of each side

-k*2 = ln(\frac{36}{64}

solving for k, I get, K = 0.28768then going to \theta(3)

putting it into the equation, then a calculator

64*e^{-0.28768*3} = 27

I think this is right, since it is a real number / integer, and it sort of fits the pattern

-

if someone could check, i'd be very happy, thank you :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, you haven't answered the very first question.

vorcil said:
a) let \theta = T - \hat{T}, Show that \frac{d\theta}{dt} = -k\theta
Don't worry, when I was studying this, I did exactly the same thing and assumed I already had answered it. It's quite an arbitrary idea so you may need a little more practise here, because it's asked quite often on tests.

So you have the equations:

<br /> \frac{dT}{dt} = -k(T - \hat{T}) <br />

\theta=T-\hat{T}

And you need to show that

\frac{d\theta}{dt} = -k\theta

Use the fact that \frac{d\theta}{dt}=\frac{d\theta}{dT}.\frac{dT}{dt}

vorcil said:
exponentiating both sides
eln(\theta) = e^{-kt +c} = Ce^{-kt}
though I'm not sure why the C goes out to the front, or why it is being multiplied by C
By a rule of exponentiation, a^{b+c}=a^ba^c

so e^{-kt+c}=e^{-kt}e^c but since c is just some constant we don't know yet, ec is also just some constant, so we simplify things and just give it another constant C (big c, don't use the same constant because c\neq e^c).

Everything else is right, but if you aren't strapped for time in a test situation, then you may want to try a slightly more elegant approach to giving the final answer which will be an exact solution rather than relying on your calculator, for example, rather than:

vorcil said:
taking the logarithim of each side

-k*2 = ln(\frac{36}{64}

solving for k, I get, K = 0.28768


then going to \theta(3)

putting it into the equation, then a calculator

64*e^{-0.28768*3} = 27

You could do this,

-2k=ln\left(\frac{36}{64}\right)=ln\left(\frac{9}{16}\right)

k=\frac{-1}{2}ln\left(\frac{9}{16}\right)

=ln\left(\left(\frac{9}{16}\right)^{-1/2}\right)

=ln\left(\left(\frac{16}{9}\right)^{1/2}\right)

k=ln\left(\frac{4}{3}\right)

then

\theta(3)=64e^{-3ln\left(\frac{4}{3}\right)}

=64\left(e^{ln4-ln3}\right)^{-3}

by using a combination of the rules ln\frac{a}{b}=lna-lnb and e^{ab}=(e^a)^b

=64\left(\frac{e^{ln4}}{e^{ln3}}\right)^{-3}

=64\left(\frac{3}{4}\right)^3

=64\left(\frac{27}{64}\right)

\theta(3)=27


There you have it, a confirmation that 27 is indeed the correct answer and your calculator isn't rounding off or anything.
Doing this in practise you'll of course be able to skip a lot of steps when you get more comfortable at doing it :smile:

good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K