MHB Understanding Andrew Browder's Prop 8.7: Operator Norm and Sequences

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on Proposition 8.7 from Andrew Browder's "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction," specifically regarding the proof of the inequality involving operator norms. Participants express confusion about the proof's completeness, noting that Browder leaves the assertion unproven, which some find trivial while others struggle with it. A key point raised is the relationship between the norms, where the inequality can be expressed in terms of a series expansion. One participant successfully derives the inequality by substituting specific values for the operators involved, leading to a clearer understanding. Overall, the thread emphasizes the need for rigorous proof and clarity in mathematical analysis.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Andrew Browder's book: "Mathematical Analysis: An Introduction" ... ...

I am currently reading Chapter 8: Differentiable Maps and am specifically focused on Section 8.1 Linear Algebra ...

I need yet further help in fully understanding the proof of Proposition 8.7 ...Proposition 8.7 and its proof reads as follows:
View attachment 9399
View attachment 9400My question is as follows:Can someone please demonstrate, formally and rigorously, the last assertion of the above proposition ... ... That is, can someone please demonstrate, formally and rigorously, that ... ... $$ \| I - L^{ -1 } \| \leq \| I - L \| ( 1 - \| I - L \|)^{-1} $$
Help will be much appreciated ... ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Browder - 1 - Proposition 8.7 ... PART 1 ....png
    Browder - 1 - Proposition 8.7 ... PART 1 ....png
    8.4 KB · Views: 161
  • Browder - 2 - Proposition 8.7 ... PART 2 ... ....png
    Browder - 2 - Proposition 8.7 ... PART 2 ... ....png
    7.9 KB · Views: 163
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a little confused. Isn't that what the proof in the book is supposed to do?
 
Ackbach said:
I'm a little confused. Isn't that what the proof in the book is supposed to do?
Hi Ackbach ... ...

Hmmm ... can only say I agree with you ...

But Browder leaves the assertion unproven ...

I can only assume that Browder thinks the proof is obvious and trivial ... but I am having problems formulating a proof .. so I hope that someone can help ...

PeterEDIT: I note in passing that in relation to the assertion $$ \| I - L^{ -1 } \| \leq \| I - L \| ( 1 - \| I - L \|)^{-1} $$we have that $$ \| I - L \| ( 1 - \| I - L \|)^{-1} = \frac{ \| I - L \| }{ ( 1 - \| I - L \|) }$$$$= \| I - L \| + \| I - L \|^2 + \| I - L \|^3 + \ ... \ ... \ ... $$
But I cannot see how to use this in the proof ... but it might be helpful :) ... Peter
 
Last edited:
Browder has shown during the proof of Proposition 8.7 that $\|I-S\| \leqslant \dfrac t{1-t}$. But $S=L^{-1}$ and $t = \|T\| = \|I-L\|$. So that inequality becomes $\|I-L^{-1}\| \leqslant \dfrac {\|I-L\|}{1- \|I-L\|}$.
 
Opalg said:
Browder has shown during the proof of Proposition 8.7 that $\|I-S\| \leqslant \dfrac t{1-t}$. But $S=L^{-1}$ and $t = \|T\| = \|I-L\|$. So that inequality becomes $\|I-L^{-1}\| \leqslant \dfrac {\|I-L\|}{1- \|I-L\|}$.
... Hmmm ... I should have seen that .

Appreciate the help, Opalg ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K