Understanding Ax = x cos(angle) and Ay = y sin(angle) in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 529879
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The formulas Ax = x cos(angle) and Ay = y sin(angle) are essential in physics for determining the x and y components of vector quantities like velocity and force. Understanding these components simplifies mathematical operations such as vector addition, making it easier to analyze two-dimensional motion. The discussion highlights the importance of trigonometry in converting between magnitude and angle to components. Basic trigonometric principles, such as the definitions of sine and cosine, are fundamental to applying these formulas effectively. Mastery of these concepts is crucial for success in introductory physics courses.
member 529879
In physics we use the formulas Ax = x cos(angle) and Ay = y sin(angle) to find the x or y component of a vector. How do these formulas work, and what all can they be used for?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Scheuerf said:
In physics we use the formulas Ax = x cos(angle) and Ay = y sin(angle) to find the x or y component of a vector. How do these formulas work, and what all can they be used for?

Have you studied trigonometry?
 
I'm taking my first year of high school physics and algebra/trig this year so I don't know too much about trigonometry as of now.
 
Many physical quantities have both a magnitude and a direction: velocity, acceleration, force, momentum, etc. We call these vector quantities. In everyday language it's most natural to describe them using the magnitude and either one angle (for two-dimensional motion) or two angles (for three-dimensional motion). However, many mathematical operations (like adding two vectors) are easier if you use x- and y- (and possibly z-) components. So you spend a lot of time in intro physics courses learning how to convert between magnitude+angle(s) and components. That's where the trigonometry comes in.

If you need something to supplement your textbook for the mathematical details, try this:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/vect.html

It does assume that you already know basic trig stuff like the definitions of sine and cosine.
 
  • Like
Likes member 529879
If your question is related to basic trig:
Given a right triangle...

sin(angle) = opposite_length / hypotenuse_length
so, multiplying both side by hypotenuse_length gives us:
opposite_length = hypotenuse * sin(angle)
Thus, Ay = A sin(angle)

Similarly,
cos(angle) = adjacent / hypotenuse_length
so, multiplying both side by hypotenuse_length gives us:
adjacent_length = hypotenuse_length * cos(angle)
Thus, Ax =A cos(angle)

In many physics problems you'll find that the hypotenuse_length is represented by velocity or force.

Here is couple more google links 1, 2, ...
 
  • Like
Likes Shadow_Killer and (deleted member)
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top