Understanding Cauchy Sequences: Solving for a_n in an Inductive Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter Unassuming
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Sequence
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding Cauchy sequences and solving for a_n in an inductive definition. The original poster presents a recursive definition for a_n and expresses difficulty in reconciling their results with those found in a textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the recursive definition but encounters discrepancies with the textbook's result. Other participants question the clarity of the recursion and suggest checking for typographical errors. Some participants offer algebraic manipulation strategies to clarify the problem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the algebraic steps involved in the recursion. Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, while others express confusion and seek further clarification. The conversation reflects a mix of understanding and uncertainty regarding the algebraic manipulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential typos in the original recursion definition, which may contribute to the confusion. The discussion also touches on the broader concept of Cauchy sequences and their properties, although these points are not the primary focus of the problem at hand.

Unassuming
Messages
165
Reaction score
0
Let a_1 and a_2 be arbitrary real number that are not equal. For [tex]n \geq 3[/tex], define a_n inductively by,

[tex]a_n = \frac{1}{2} (a_{n-1}+a_{n+2} )[/tex]



I cannot get the result that the book gets. I proceed,

[tex]a_{n+1} - a_{n} = \frac{1}{2}(a_n + a_{n-1} ) - \frac{1}{2} (a_{n-1} + a_{n-2} ) = \frac{1}{2} ( a_n - a_{n-2} <br /> )= \frac{1}{2}(a_n + a_{n-1} )[/tex]

The book got the answer,

[tex]a_{n+1} - a_n = \frac{-1}{2} (a_n - a_{n-1} )[/tex]

Any help for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got some typos in there that are making this really confusing. The original recursion is a_n=(1/2)*(a_n-1+a_n-2), right? That says 2*a_n-a_n-1=a_n-2. I agree with the book.
 
I can't see it. I've done some algebra and I still can't get anywhere from your last step.
 
You've got a_n+1-a_n=(1/2)(a_n-a_n-2), right? Put the expression for a_n-2 into that. If you still aren't getting it show your work.
 
I got it. Thanks Dick
 
Here's a "cheat":
Since [itex]\sum x^n/n![/itex] is the Taylor's series for ex, 1+ 1/2!+ 1/3!+ ... converges to e. Since it converges, it is a Cauchy sequence!

Or you could just note that the numeric series converges by the ratio test. Again, since it converges, it is a Cauchy sequence.

But I doubt that either of those answers is what was wanted!
 
Those are nice things to put the problem into perspective though. Sometimes I (and hopefully others) get lost in the algebra of the problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K