Understanding Causality & Tacheyon Time Travel

  • Thread starter Thread starter munky99999
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of tachyons, hypothetical particles that move faster than light and may travel backward in time. It raises questions about causality, specifically whether event A can still cause event B if time is perceived differently by tachyons. The paradox arises when considering scenarios where the effects of A occur before A itself, challenging the traditional understanding of cause and effect. Participants express skepticism about the existence of tachyons, emphasizing their theoretical nature and the implications for information propagation. The conversation highlights the complexities of time, causality, and the implications of faster-than-light travel.
munky99999
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/CausalityProblem.html

If the tacheyon was going backwards in time, then how is this wrong, or contradictory?




Also, I'm not to sure of the definition of Causality, if it states event A must happen before B, then couldn't we further extend this to say ask long as time is moving forward. If time is going backward then would it not mean B before A?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That problem is the result of A setting into affect the actions which result in B, say having a ladder kicked out from under you causes you to fall. if the events where to be connected faster than c, then you would fall before the ladder was kicked out from under you. Hence the paradox, you fall before some one kicks the ladder, and the causality has been affected. A no longer causes B because it happens afterwards.
 
ya i get that, but if time is moving backwards to the tacheyon, would it not be perfectly fine for the tacheyon, hence we are making a difficult frame of reference. In the tacheyons frame of reference it would all look completely correct, would it not?
 
I don't remember. Has anybody found a tachyon yet?

cookiemonster
 
nope entirely theoretical.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
7K
Replies
35
Views
505
Replies
30
Views
3K
Back
Top