Understanding Central Forces in Polar Coordinates

  • Thread starter Thread starter AntiStrange
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the equations of motion for an object influenced by a central force in polar coordinates. The first equation relates radial acceleration and centripetal force, highlighting the need for both the central force and the centripetal term due to the object's motion in a curved path. The second equation addresses angular motion, emphasizing that tangential forces should not exist in this scenario, which clarifies why the equation is set to zero. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of how these components interact when an object spirals outward, reinforcing the relationship between radial and angular motion. Overall, the thread clarifies the dynamics of central forces in polar coordinates.
AntiStrange
Messages
18
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I'm supposed to read this little packet on mechanics, specifically dealing with central forces.
and they are explaining a scenario where something is moving due to a central force (say, the Earth rotating around the sun) where all the motion takes place in the xy plane. They describe some initial conditions y0 = z0 = 0 for example and Vz = 0 because it's not moving in the z direction.
Then they switch to polar coordinates (r,theta) and they say the equations of motion are:
m\ddot{r} - mr\dot{\theta}^2 = F(r)
mr\ddot{\theta} + 2m\dot{r}\dot{\theta} = 0

Homework Equations


Force: F = m*a
Angular Velocity: \omega = \frac{v_{t}}{r}
Angular Acceleration: \alpha = \frac{d\omega}{dt}
Centripetal Acceleration: \alpha_{c} = \omega^{2}r = \frac{v^{2}_{t}}{r}

v_t = tangential speed

The Attempt at a Solution


well for the first equation of motion they give, I recognize that the first part is a force m*a because \ddot{r} is an acceleration. Because it's the acceleration of the radius it should be the centripetal force right? But I don't understand why there needs to be another force component subtracted from this one, because the only force acting on this object should be the central force. In addition to that, the second component appears to ALSO be the same central force because \dot{\theta} is the angular velocity \omega and that is squared times the radius which is just another way to find the centripetal acceleration. So I don't understand why there needs to both, let alone why they must be subtracted.

edit: the two dots aren't showing up above the theta below, but instead of (theta)r it should be d^2(theta)/dt^2 * r
For the second equation of motion they have \ddot{\theta}r is just the angular acceleration times the mass would be any force that acts tangential to the motion, which should not exist in this case which is why it is equal to zero. But again I don't know why they include a second part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first equation is Newton's Second Law in the radial direction. Imagine an object spiraling out moving faster and faster as time increases. In the radial direction, the force does two things: (a) it causes the component of the velocity vr to increase as the object spirals out (first term) and (b) it causes the object to go around a curved path (second "centripetal" term).

If you consider an object going around a circle, i.e. r = constant,

\dot{r} = 0

which changes your radial equation to the familiar "centripetal force" equation,

<br /> - mr\dot{\theta}^2 = F(r)<br />
 
Ok that makes perfect sense now. Thank you!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top