Understanding Centripetal Force: The Case of Rotating Objects on a Table

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force acts perpendicular to the velocity of a rotating object, modifying its trajectory without changing kinetic energy. In the scenario described, object1 rotates on a table while connected to object2 via a rope, with tension providing the necessary centripetal force. Object1's inertia attempts to move it in a straight line, creating tension in the rope that supports object2. If object1 maintains a perfect circular trajectory without friction, it will not move toward the center of the table. This principle mirrors the behavior of planets in circular orbits, where the balance of forces keeps them in stable paths.
fisico30
Messages
362
Reaction score
0
Hello Forum,
I think I understand what the centripetal force does: it is a force perpendicular to the velocity of the object, a force that does not cause changes in kinetic energy but only modifies the trajectory.

I am not clear on this specific situation: object1 is rotating on a table. It is also connected through a rope to another object2 that is hanging just under the center of the table. The tension in the string supports the weight of object2. Object2 is supported as long as object 1 is rotating at the right speed.
Here the question: object1 has some inertia and tries to move along the tangent direction, along a straight path.
The tension T in the rope is the centripetal force on object1 and points radially inward. At the same time, object1 exerts a force (by action-reaction) on the rope itself pointing radially outward. So the inertia of object 1, its tendency to maintain its straight line motion causes the tension in the rope that is then transmitted via the rope to the hanging object2.

Why is object1 not being pulled toward the center of the table while it rotates?
In the centripetal force examples of free-falling objects trapped in the gravitational field of a planet, the objects are actually falling and moving towards the center but the radial distance they fall toward the center is compensated by the distance traveled along the tangent: the object remains at a fixed distance from the center.

In the case of the rotating object1 on the table, the object1 is not actually moving at all toward the center, or is it...?

thanks for any conceptual clarification,
fisico30
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the trajectory is perfectly circular, and there are no frictional forces, and the velocity is calibrated perfectly, then object 1 will not move towards the center.

This is also true for circular orbits of planets.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top