Understanding Complex Numbers: A Visual Explanation

QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3
Complex Numbers, I just don't understand what they are supposed to represent. I understand how they are used, to some degree in solving equations etc. but the definitions leave me clueless. The idea that they "extend the idea of the one-dimensional number line to the two-dimensional complex plane" sort of makes sense. If each number consists of a real part and an imaginary part (a+bi etc.), then starting from a number-line representing the real number a, you can extend a y-axis to represent i. But what does that really mean?? What would be a good visual explanation of this concept?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have been struggling with the same difficulty for several years. Finally, there was a YouTube video a few months ago which gave a reasonably logical demonstration that complex numbers represent rotation. Think of a number represented in just one direction on a number line. Multiplication by i^2 is rotation by 180 degrees, and multiplication instead by just i is rotation by just 90 degrees.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top