Understanding Conditional Probability in Standard Normal Distributions

mariank
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am in need of an advice regarding a conditional probability... Although it is very simple, I haven't found anywhere anything similar so I am not sure I get it right...I tried numerically calculating this conditional probability using 2 approaches (in Mathematica) and I get 2 completely different results, which are both very different from my intuition... I would be very happy if you could help me figure it out.

Let X, Y be 2 standard normal r.v. and Z=\sqrt{q}Y+\sqrt{1-q}X-\Phi^{-1}(p).
s.t he unconditional probability of P(Z>0)=1-p

What I would like to compute is P(Z>0|Y>0).

here is what I have tried:

1. P(Z>0|Y>0)=P(Z>0, Y>0)/P(Y>0)=\int_{0}^\infty \int_{0}^\infty \phi_{zy}(z,y) dz dy/0.5 where \phi_{zy}(z,y) is the joint normal birvariate distribution of z and y, where the covariance between z and y is\sqrt{q}.
Weird enough, computing this numerically turns out that P(Z>0|Y>0) is at most 0.5(even when I put p=0.01, that means P(Z>0)=0.99) (which is very weird, right?)

2. The second thing I was advised to do is to write P(Z>0|Y>0)=\int_0^\infty P(Z>0|Y=y) \phi(y) dy(P(Z>0|Y=y)=P(X>\phi^{-1}(p)-y\sqrt{q}/{\sqrt{1-q}}))...these results are even smaller than the previous one...

So what is that I am doing wrong?

I would very much appreciate your help. Thanks a lot,folks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mariank said:
Dear all,here is what I have tried:

1. P(Z>0|Y>0)=P(Z>0, Y>0)/P(Y>0)

So what is that I am doing wrong?

I don't understand this expression. The correct expression for Bayes Theorem is:

P(Z>0|Y>0)=P(Y>0|P(Z>0)P(Z>0)/P(Y>0)
 
Last edited:
For the continuous case, I think you want:

f_{Z,Y}(z,y)=f_{Z|Y}(z|y)f_{Y}(y); Y>0, Z>0
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top