Understanding Covalent Bonds: Why Do They Hold Molecules Together?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RichyOwen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonds Molecules
RichyOwen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I took chemistry a couple years ago but never got a satisfactory answer as to why covalent bonds hold molecules together. I understand that they share their outermost electrons, but why would that keep them together? Do the electrons pull against each other or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PhysicsForums, RichyOwen!

A simple way of considering it: if two positive nuclei are attracted to the same negative electron, and that attractive force exceeds the repulsion of the two positive nuclei, then net attraction means the nuclei form a covalent bond.

That binding energy is not very strong compared to the binding of positively charged protons and neutrons due to the strong force within the nucleus, of course.
 
Thanks so much! I was quite puzzled. Do you know if covalent theory is accepted by most quantum physicists?
 
Also, will the two nuclei then be the same distance (on average) from the shared electron?
 
RichyOwen said:
Thanks so much! I was quite puzzled. Do you know if covalent theory is accepted by most quantum physicists?
Yes, it is. The question would have been maybe more apt for the Atomic, solid state, comp phys forum.
One of the best explanations of covalent bonding in my opinion is given in this article by Kutzelnigg:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.197305461/abstract
 
Sorry I'm new to this forum stuff. Thank you!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top