Understanding Covalent Bonds: Why Do They Hold Molecules Together?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RichyOwen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonds Molecules
RichyOwen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I took chemistry a couple years ago but never got a satisfactory answer as to why covalent bonds hold molecules together. I understand that they share their outermost electrons, but why would that keep them together? Do the electrons pull against each other or something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PhysicsForums, RichyOwen!

A simple way of considering it: if two positive nuclei are attracted to the same negative electron, and that attractive force exceeds the repulsion of the two positive nuclei, then net attraction means the nuclei form a covalent bond.

That binding energy is not very strong compared to the binding of positively charged protons and neutrons due to the strong force within the nucleus, of course.
 
Thanks so much! I was quite puzzled. Do you know if covalent theory is accepted by most quantum physicists?
 
Also, will the two nuclei then be the same distance (on average) from the shared electron?
 
RichyOwen said:
Thanks so much! I was quite puzzled. Do you know if covalent theory is accepted by most quantum physicists?
Yes, it is. The question would have been maybe more apt for the Atomic, solid state, comp phys forum.
One of the best explanations of covalent bonding in my opinion is given in this article by Kutzelnigg:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/anie.197305461/abstract
 
Sorry I'm new to this forum stuff. Thank you!
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top