MHB Understanding Curve Sketching for a Challenging Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter kjland
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
kjland
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone I'm having some difficulty wit curve sketching this specific function.
If some one could walk through the steps and solution so that i can hopefully grab a handle on the concept it would be much appreciated! I can handle the beginner functions, but this one is giving me a hard time, thank you.

Sketch the graph of
f(x) = x^3 / x^3 + 1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am assuming we have:

$$f(x)=\frac{x^3}{x^3+1}$$

I would first look at $x$ and $y$ intercepts...what do you find?

Then I would focus on asymptotes...do you find any vertical/horizontal asymptotes?

If you are unsure how to find intercepts/asymptotes, let me know and I will explain. :)
 
MarkFL said:
I am assuming we have:

$$f(x)=\frac{x^3}{x^3+1}$$

I would first look at $x$ and $y$ intercepts...what do you find?

Then I would focus on asymptotes...do you find any vertical/horizontal asymptotes?

If you are unsure how to find intercepts/asymptotes, let me know and I will explain. :)

$y$ intercept is at $x=0$.

$$x=0 \Leftrightarrow f(0)$$

$x$ intercept is at $y=0$.

$$y=0 \Leftrightarrow 0=\frac{x^3}{x^3+1}$$

$$f(0)=0$$

$$0=\frac{x^3}{x^3+1}$$

$$x=0$$

How do you find asymptotes?

This is a rational function. In other words the rule of the function is a rational expression. The dominator cannot be zero!

$$x^3+1 \neq 0$$

Argument? The function becomes undefined when the denominator is zero. Because dividing by zero breaks the universe!

But we can sort of defy the rule and make a new statement that makes the denominator equal to zero. This allows us to figure out at what x value the denominator becomes zero!

$$x^3+1 = 0$$

$$x=-1$$

Once we know this, we know at what x value the function is undefined. There will be a vertical asymptote at that x value (hence the name "vertical").

I still haven't learned how we find any horizontal asymptotes. Do we need the inverse function for this? Anyway! I don't think it's needed in this example.

So we have these points on the graph:

$$(0,0)$$

$$(0,0)$$

In other words the graph passes through these points. In fact, it's the same point!

We have to exclude $(-1,0)$ and all other $(-1,y)$ points, because this is where the vertical asymptote is.

Maybe you can complete this with a way to find the horizontal asymptote? (Smile)

For a nicer graph you can create a table of values, and then use these to approximate where the graph will pass.
 
For the horizontal asymptotes, we can write the function as:

$$f(x)=\frac{1}{1+\dfrac{1}{x^3}}$$ where $x\ne0$.

And then consider the limit:

$$\lim_{x\to\pm\infty}f(x)=1$$

So, we know $y=1$ is the horizontal asymptote.

If this has been posted in the Calculus forum, we could go on to examine slope and concavity for further clues about the function's behavior. However, the suggestion by samir to create and $xy$ chart is a good one to help find other points to give you an idea of how the graph behaves.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top