Understanding Dative Bonding: Definition, Examples, and Importance

  • Thread starter Thread starter spacecraze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bonding
AI Thread Summary
Dative bonding, also known as coordination complex bonding, involves the sharing of a pair of electrons from a single atom, differing from covalent bonding where electrons come from two atoms. This type of bonding typically occurs in compounds where one atom has unbonded lone pair electrons in its valence shell, allowing it to donate those electrons to another atom. A common example is the nitrogen atom in neutral molecules, which can participate in dative bonding due to its lone pairs. Identifying dative bonds in compounds requires recognizing the presence of these lone pairs and understanding the bonding context. Understanding dative bonding is crucial for grasping the behavior of coordination complexes in chemistry.
spacecraze
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Same as coordination complex bond.
 
ok, dative bonding is the same as coordination complex bonding, but could you pls tell me what really happens in this?

I know in this type , the shared pair of electrons comes from the same atom instead of two (that is, unlike in covalent), but if I'm given any type of compond, i want to be able to identify whether it is a dative bond or not, and in what kind of compounds does it generally occur?
 
Dative bonding occurs when atoms that have unbonded lone pair electrons in their valence shell contribute to bonding. Best example is the nitrogen atom in neutral molecules.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Back
Top