Understanding Derivatives: Solving with Power Rule vs. Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter swears
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the concept of derivatives, specifically comparing the application of the power rule to the limit definition of a derivative for the function F(X) = X - X^2.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of a derivative and how to apply it correctly, questioning the algebraic manipulation involved in finding f(x+h) and the subsequent simplification steps. There are attempts to clarify the correct application of the limit definition and the importance of maintaining proper signs in expressions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on algebraic techniques and the correct setup for applying the limit definition. Some participants express confusion about specific algebraic steps, while others attempt to clarify these points, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with algebraic manipulation and the importance of correctly applying the definition of a derivative, highlighting potential misunderstandings in basic algebra that may affect the calculus concepts being discussed.

I should:

  • Drop Calculus

    Votes: 2 16.7%
  • Keep Trying

    Votes: 10 83.3%

  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .
swears
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
I'm having a really hard time grabbing a hold of this definition of a derivative concept.

I know that the derivative of [tex]X-X^2 = 1-2X.[/tex], when solving w/ the power rule.
But, I get really lost when I need to solve it using the definition of the derivitave. Can someone please explain to me how I get from the 1st step to the 2nd.

[tex]F(X) = X - X^2[/tex]

1. [tex]F'(X) = \frac{F(X+H) - F(X)}{H}[/tex]

2. [tex]= \frac{(X+H)^2 - X^2}{H}[/tex]The way I tried it, I just input [tex]X - X^2[/tex] for X and I got [tex](X - X^2 + H) - (X-X^2)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
swears said:
I'm having a really hard time grabbing a hold of this definition of a derivative concept.

I know that the derivative of [tex]X-X^2 = 1-X.[/tex], when solving w/ the power rule.

Nope... try to do that derivative again

The way I tried it, I just input [tex]X - X^2[/tex] for X and I got [tex](X - X^2 + H) - (X-X^2)[/tex]

If f(x) is x-x^2, what is f(x+h) it's not x-x^2 + h, I will tell you that much, but it sounds like you have some issues with algebra as well. You applied the definition wrong, so give it another go.
 
I fixed that first part sorry. lol
 
vsage said:
If f(x) is x-x^2, what is f(x+h) it's not x-x^2 + h,

Yeah, that's my problem, I don't know how to do that.
 
Split up your function to make things much simpler. Let's say you have [tex]f(x)=x[/tex] and [tex]g(x)=-x^2[/tex]

[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{(x+h)-(x)}{h}[/tex]

[tex]g'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{-(x+h)^2-(-x^2)}{h}[/tex]

Work from there.
 
Reading your first post, I'll try to clarify what I think is your problem. If you have [tex]f(x)=x^2[/tex], then something like f(2) is easy, right? You just plug in 2 for x and get 4. But what is f(a)? Do the same thing. f(a)=a^2. What is f(x+h) then? Plug in (x+h) for x. f(x+h)=(x+h)^2
 
Jameson said:
[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{(x+h)-(x)}{h}[/tex]

[tex]g'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{-(x+h)^2-(-x^2)}{h}[/tex]

Why does the H get squared and negated?
 
swears said:
I fixed that first part sorry. lol

It's still not fixed on my screen. the derivative of x-x^2 should be 1-2x (I see it in the TeX code but for some reason it isn't showing up on your post).

Let me elaborate a little. If f(x) = x-x^2, then f(x+h) = (x+h) - (x+h)^2, so expand this out. What is then f(x+h) - f(x)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vsage said:
It's still not fixed on my screen. the derivative of x-x^2 should be 1-2x (I see it in the TeX code but for some reason it isn't showing up on your post)

try refresh F5
 
  • #10
Jameson said:
Plug in (x+h) for x.

So I'm doing it backwards here?
 
  • #11
I don't understand what you mean by backwards. Look at my original post to see the correct method of using the limit definition of a derivative. I'm sorry I can't be more helpful right now.
 
  • #12
Jameson said:
Plug in (x+h) for x.

Ok, if i try it this way, I get: [tex](x+h) + h - (x+h)^2[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #13
You want to solve the limit of [tex]\frac { f(x+h) - f(x)} {h}[/tex] as h approaches 0, right? If f(x) = x - x^2, then f(x+h) - f(x) = (x+h) - (x+h)^2 - (x - x^2)). I'm a little concerned though as these problems you are having are algebraic and not calculus-based, as your thread suggests. Applying basic rules of algebra (up to factoring in the denominator to the expression) should fetch you the right answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
You wouldn't happen to have a link for these algebra rules, would you?

I understand how you plugged in [tex]x-x^2[/tex] for f(x).
but,
I don' see how you got [tex](x+h) - (x+h)^2[/tex] for [tex]f(x+h)[/tex] though.
 
  • #15
I'm going to repeat what was said here. But maybe seeing it worked out will help you a little bit more.

You know the definition of the derivatie is:
[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}[/tex]

Now you seem to be caught up with the algebra of functions. Let me go through a few examples with you:

Lets say you have a function:
[tex]f(x)=x^2[/tex]

Now let's plug in a "cat" :)

[tex]f(cat)=f(x=cat)=(cat)^2[/tex]

Now let's plug in [itex]a+b[/itex]

[tex]f(a+b)=f(x=a+b)=(a+b)^2[/tex]


Now plugging in a cat is really not any harder then plugging what you need into the limit definition I gave above. But let's try an example:

Lets create a function, say:
[tex]f(x)=x^{1000}[/tex]

You seem to be able to use the "non-limit rules" to find the derivative, so you know that:
[tex]f'(x)=1000x^{999}[/tex]

Right? That's pretty easy right.

Now let's use the limit definition.

[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} = \frac{(x+h)^{1000}-x^{1000}}{h}[/tex]

Notice what we did.

We just plugged in our values.

Do you see that:
[tex]f(x+h)=(x+h)^{1000}[/tex]

You can think of it like this if you want.
let [itex]x+h = cat [/tex]<br /> [tex]f(x)=x^{1000}[/tex]<br /> [tex]f(cat)=(cat)^{1000}[/tex]<br /> <br /> And we know that [itex]cat = x+h[/itex] so...<br /> [tex]f(cat=x+h)=(cat=x+h)^{1000}[/tex]<br /> or in a more popular way to write it:<br /> [tex]f(x+h)=(x+h)^{1000}[/tex]<br /> <br /> So really, you are just plugging in values.[/itex]
 
  • #16
Thanks for your help.

So I did: [tex]f(x) = x - x^2[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = \frac {x + h - (x + h)^2 - x - x^2}{h}[/tex]

Now I tried to simplify but I get stuck or have done it wrong.

[tex]= \frac {x + h - x^2 + 2xh + h^2 - x - x^2}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac {h - 2x^2 + 2xh + h^2}{h}[/tex] // I canceled out the x and combined the x squared

Is this right?
 
Last edited:
  • #17
swears said:
Thanks for your help.

So I did: [tex]f(x) = x - x^2[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = \frac {x + h - (x + h)^2 - x - x^2}{h}[/tex]
Watch out, at the end of the numerator you should have "-f(x)". With f(x) = x-x², this becomes -(x-x²) = -x+x².
 
  • #18
So, your saying I need to distribute the minus sign to f(x)?
 
  • #19
Of course, when it says -f(x), f(x) is considered as a whole and should therefore be placed within parathesis. This gives -(x-x²) which simplifies to -x+x² and not -x-x².
 
  • #20
TD said:
Of course, when it says -f(x), f(x) is considered as a whole and should therefore be placed within parathesis. This gives -(x-x²) which simplifies to -x+x² and not -x-x².

Ah ok, thanks for explaining that.
 
  • #21
Tried again,

[tex]f(x) = x - x^2[/tex]

[tex]f'(x) = \frac {x+h - (x + h)^2 - (x - x^2)}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac {x + h - x^2 + h^2 + 2xh - x + x^2}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac {h + h^2 + 2xh}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac {h [2x + h]}{h}[/tex]

[tex]= 2x + h[/tex] // Now I'm lost
 
  • #22
You really have to watch our signs, there's a minus before (x+h)² !
 
  • #23
Try not to skip steps when you are getting used to this stuff.

So if you have:

[tex]f(x) = x-x^2[/tex]
[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}[/tex]

Use paranthesis! Even if it is really obvious. At least until you are comfortable with order of operations.

so...

[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{((x+h)-(x+h)^2)-(x-x^2)}{h}[/tex]

Now here's an example for you to remember. Recall that a number multiplied by 1 is the same number.
[tex](1)(2) = 2[/tex]

Now what is this?
[tex]-(2) = 2[/tex]?

What about this?
[tex]-(x^2-2+3) =?[/tex]

You can think about the negative sign as [itex]-1[/itex]. So in the first example we can rewrite it as:
[tex](-1)(2) = -2[/tex]

and the second example:
[tex](-1)(x^2-2+3)[/tex]

Do what's in the parenthesis first:
[tex](-1)(x^2-2+3)=(-1)(x^2+1)[/tex]
[tex](-1)(x^2+1) = (-1)(x^2) + (-1)(1) = -x^2 - 1[/tex]


So back to this example:
[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{((x+h)-(x+h)^2)-(x-x^2)}{h}[/tex]

You can also think of this like:
[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{((x+h)+(-1)(x+h)^2)+(-1)(x-x^2)}{h}[/tex]

Also, if it gets to confusing using just parenthesis. Remember that you can use other symbols too.

For example:
[tex]f'(x)=\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{[(x+h)+(-1)(x+h)^2]+[(-1)(x-x^2)]}{h}[/tex]

Notice how the terms in between [...] are used to represent the function.

For example:
[tex]f(x) = x-x^2[/tex]
[tex]g(x) = f(a+b)^2 + f(\lambda)[/tex]

Now if you use the brackets, it is easy to see:
[tex]g(x) = [(a+b)-(a+b)^2]^2 + [\lambda -\lambda^2][/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #24
Ok, I fixed my mistake and I got :

[tex]\frac {h(-2x-h)}{h}[/tex]

So, now do I need to set -2x-h = 0?

Because when I do that I get -2x = h . But I know the derivative is 1-2x. How do I get the 1?
 
  • #25
How did you get that? Let's see:

[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{\left( {\left( {x + h} \right) - \left( {x + h} \right)^2 } \right) - \left( {x - x^2 } \right)}}{h} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{x + h - x^2 - 2xh - h^2 - x + x^2 }}{h}[/tex]

Now simplying and factoring h gives:

[tex] \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{h - 2xh - h^2 }}{h} = \mathop {\lim }\limits_{h \to 0} \frac{{h\left( {1 - 2x - h} \right)}}{h}[/tex]

Which is a bit different from your answer. Check it again.
Then, cancel out the h and let h go to 0.
 
  • #26
Oh yeah, I forgot the first h.

[tex]1-2x-h = 0[/tex]

[tex]1-2x = h[/tex]

So I'm guessing the h stands for the derivative. I'm going to try a few more of these on my own.

I'd like to thank everyone for helping me, I couldn't have done it w/o you. Looks like I won't be dropping calculus yet.
 
  • #27
No, it's not an equation (where did the = 0 come from?) It was a limit of that expression, so in "1-2x-h", let h go to 0. What do you get?
 
  • #28
oh, so I plug in 0 for h.

which gets 1-2x-0 or 1-2x
 
  • #29
Indeed, and is that compatible with the answer you'd find by using the normal derivative rules?
 
  • #30
Yes, with the power rule.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K