Understanding Dimensional Analysis and Deriving M = L^3 T^-2 for Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter HotMintea
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive
AI Thread Summary
Dimensional analysis of mass using Newton's equations suggests that mass can be expressed as [length]^3 [time]^-2. However, there is skepticism regarding this claim, with some participants asserting that mass cannot be represented in this way. The discussion highlights the need for a valid equation for force that aligns with the dimensional analysis. Concerns are raised about the credibility of the source that proposed this relationship. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of rigorous analysis in deriving physical quantities.
HotMintea
Messages
42
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Maxwell showed that we can easily do a dimensional analysis on mass, using only Newton’s equations. Mass is [length]^3 [time]^-2 ." (http://milesmathis.com/coul.html)

I would like to know how to do the dimensional analysis and derive M = L^3 T^-2.

2. The attempt at a solution

Since the right side of F\ = \frac{dp}{dt} has M^1, I think I need another equation for force that has M^n on the right side, where n ≠ 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass is definitely not [length]^3 [time]^-2. That link is a crackpot website.
 
ideasrule said:
Mass is definitely not [length]^3 [time]^-2. That link is a crackpot website.

That may be why the author did not cite the source!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top