Understanding Dimensional Analysis in Basic Linear Motion Formulas

  • Thread starter Thread starter lozzajp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formulas Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of dimensional analysis to basic linear motion formulas in physics. The user explores how manipulating units reveals insights into the relationships between variables, but encounters confusion with larger formulas like S=(1/2)at^2 and v^2=2as. They question why dimensional analysis leads to results like m = half m and express concern about potentially overthinking the process. A key point raised is that focusing solely on units may overlook the significance of dimensionless constants in the equations. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the balance between understanding units and the broader context of physical formulas.
lozzajp
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
One thing I enjoy as a new physics student is using formulas. I have been playing with the fundamental formulas in terms of units rather than their names.

That is instead of a=v/t
m/s/s=(m/s)/s

or v=at
m/s=(m/s/s) x s
m/s=m/s

Simple maths yea, but when I am getting to the bigger formulas I am having trouble, perhaps they just don't work the way i am thinking but if someone could enlighten me that would be great..

S=(1/2)at^2
m=(1/2)x(m/s^2)x(s^2)
m=(1/2)x(m)

why do i get m = half m?

v^2 = 2as
m^2/s^2 = 2(m/s/s) x m
m^2/s^2 = 2 x m^2/s^2
m/s = 2 x m/s

again, there is a x2 factor there.

am i just thinking about this too much?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are only looking at the units you are throwing away any "dimensionless" constants in the formulas. From that point of view, there is not difference between "m" and "m/2"- both have dimensions of "meters" which is all you are looking at.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top