Understanding Energy Equations: Mass, Gravity & Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaredogden
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
Understanding the derivation of energy equations, particularly kinetic energy, involves relating units to concepts rather than rote memorization. Energy is measured in Joules, equating to kg*m^2/s^2, which simplifies the comprehension of potential energy as it correlates mass, gravity, and height. Kinetic energy, defined as energy due to motion, incorporates mass and the square of velocity, leading to the formula KE = 1/2 mv^2. The factor of 1/2 in the kinetic energy equation arises from the work-energy principle, where work done on an object changes its kinetic energy. This relationship is confirmed through calculations involving force and acceleration, demonstrating the connection between work and kinetic energy.
jaredogden
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
So I have just been sitting around trying to relate equations to units to maybe understand their derivation. I feel like it is more beneficial to understand a subject and be able logically come to a conclusion and not just memorize formulas.

We know that energy is measure in Joules which of course are a kg*m^2/s^2. This makes equations for energy much easier to understand for example potential energy which is the measure of energy stored in an object due to its position in a force field and is directly proportional to an objects mass in kg times the force of gravity (the force field) in m/s^2 times the objects height in meters. This obviously translates into the correct units of joules or kg*m^2/s^2.

Now I was thinking about kinetic energy and since it is the amount of energy an object possesses due to its motion. It makes sense that mass would still have to be used and that the objects velocity would come into play since it is a measure of energy due to motion, and since velocity is measured in m/s squaring the velocity would be necessary to produce m^2/s^2.

My only question for kinetic energy is why we take half the product of the objects mass times velocity squared? Is this just simply because (1/2) is a constant that matches the calculated value up with experimental data or am I missing something? Thanks for any help ahead of time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try considering that work is done to anybody to change its kinetic energy. In the simplest case it is work done to bring a mass m from an inital velocity of 0 rest to a final velocity v. The work done equals the change in kinetic energy.

W=Fd
W=mad
From vf2-vi2=2ad and vi=0
we get d = vf2/2a
Substituting in W=mad and making vf into v:
W = mv2/2
or
Kinetic energy =mv2/2
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top