Understanding Energy & Momentum in Motion

AI Thread Summary
Momentum and energy are essential for describing motion because they represent different aspects of physical systems; momentum is a vector quantity related to motion, while energy is a scalar quantity associated with the capacity to do work. The relationship between energy and time, and momentum and space, highlights their fundamental roles in physics, with energy reflecting time symmetry and momentum reflecting space symmetry. The equation dV/dx = dp/dt illustrates how changes in potential energy relate to changes in momentum over time. Understanding these connections can provide deeper insights into the conservation laws governing physical systems. Overall, momentum and energy together offer a comprehensive framework for analyzing motion and its effects.
Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
Could someone give me some deeper insight why we need to have momentum and energy to describe motion? Kinetic energy is only the square root of momentum divided by two times the mass of the particle. Why the need for this extra entity energy?

I know that energy is a scalar and momentum is a vector, and that momentum generates space symmetry and energy generates time symmetry. But I would like to have some further insights why energy is connected to time and momentum to space.

And why dV/dx = dp/dt ?

Why is the space derivative of the (potential) energy equal to the time derivative?

Again, I would like to have some clever insights and deep-down ideas on how energy, momentum, time and space are related.

thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Im very new to all this and have only just started to cover it in class but this might be helpful or it might be way to basic, haha

why we need to have momentum and energy to describe motion

Conservation of momentum inside a system doesn't have any bearing on the outside momentum (for example a plane flying along with people moving around inside) but the energy inside the system can change the total amount of energy that system has. So if the plane was to crash and everyone ran forward it would increase the energy the plane has on impact.

Hope this is more or less correct and helps. Also interested to hear feedback on it!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top