I Understanding Entanglement Measures and the Bloch Sphere Representation

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter edguy99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entanglement
edguy99
Gold Member
Messages
449
Reaction score
28
"To do this, the scientists turned the difficult analytical problem into an easy geometrical one. They showed that, in many cases, the amount of entanglement between states corresponds to the distance between two points on a Bloch sphere, which is basically a normal 3D sphere that physicists use to model quantum states."

Not sure I understand "we prove by a geometric argument that polynomial entanglement measures of degree 2 are independent of the choice of pure-state decomposition of a mixed state, when the latter has only one pure unentangled state in its range". What is "degree 2"?

entanglement_visualized.jpg


https://phys.org/news/2016-02-physicists-easy-entanglementon-sphere.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My understanding is that there are two "two"'s here. One is the rank of the density matrix and another is the degree of a polynomial measure of entanglement. Degree 2 corresponds to the linear entropy.

To he honest, I have troubles understanding what's new in this paper. For instance, the fact that there are measures of entanglement based on some representations of the density matrix in terms of Bloch vectors is known for some time. In a concise form, the geometrical reasoning is presented here starting from Eq. (23) to the end of the section. In particular, it's proven there that for SU(2) all entanglement measures can be expressed in terms of the linear entropy. For SU(N) this is no longer true but limiting cases (completely disentangled and fully entangled) still turn out choice-independent. At length, the multipartite SU(2) case is considered here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top