Understanding Faraday's Law of Induction

  • Thread starter Thread starter discoverer02
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Faraday's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a bar sliding on parallel rails in a magnetic field, where participants seek clarity on the forces at play. The magnetic field is not caused by the wire itself but rather by the external setup, which leads to a magnetic force acting on the bar once it starts moving. The induced electromotive force (emf) and current in the rod must be considered, as they oppose the initial current from the battery due to the changing magnetic flux. Participants discuss the correct application of forces, including the need to account for both the applied current and the back emf created as the bar accelerates. The conversation emphasizes the importance of setting up and solving the differential equation to find the bar's speed over time.
discoverer02
Messages
138
Reaction score
1
I'm having trouble with the following problem:

A bar of mass m, length d, and resistance R slides without friction on parallel rails. A battery that maintains a constant emf E is connected between the rails, and a constant magnetic field B is directed perpendicular to the plane of the page and out of the page. If the bar starts from rest, show that at time t it moves with a speed:

v = E/Bd(1 - e^{(-B^2)(d^2)t/(mR)})

in diagram the bar is on the left and the battery is set up on the right so the current runs counterclockwise through the circuit.

The first thing that I'm confused about is the force that sets this in motion. From the problem statement and the diagram, the magnetic field is caused by the current running through the wire, so unless some force is applied to the bar it's not going to move.

I begin trying to solve the problem by working with the following equation:

Sum of the Forces in the x direction = -IdB + F_applied = ma
F_applied = mass x some initial acceleration?

Is this the correct approach. I've tried many and I'm got getting the correct answer.

Can anyone nudge me in the right direction?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Originally posted by discoverer02
The first thing that I'm confused about is the force that sets this in motion. From the problem statement and the diagram, the magnetic field is caused by the current running through the wire, so unless some force is applied to the bar it's not going to move.
That constant magnetic field coming out of the paper is not caused by the wire. You have a current carrying wire in a magnetic field, which exerts a force on it.
 
Thanks again for your help Doc Al.

I already tried this approach and didn't seem to lead me in the right direction.

The magnetic force on the rod, in this case, is directed to the left because dF = Ids X B = IdB to the left.

So the forces in the x direction are -IdB = ma

The induced E-field in the rod once it starts moving is v x B = vB.

So the induced emf in the rod once it starts moving is

\int Efield \cdot ds

which is vBd.

The induced current is vBd/R in the direction opposite the current from the battery because the magnetic flux is increasing in the loop because the area is increasing, right.

How do I treat the current already in the loop? Do I include it in the equation of my forces and subtract from it the current created by the back emf? If I do, I'm not coming up with the right answer.
 
Think of it this way. The EMF across the wire is:

ΔV = E - EMFinduced

EMFinduced = DBv

Current through the wire is:

I = ΔV /R

Force on the wire is:

F = IDB

Acceleration of the wire is:

a = dv/dt = F/m = IDB/m

Write and solve the differential equation. Make sense?
 
It makes sense.

Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top