Understanding Force on an Atom in the Heisenberg Picture of Quantum Mechanics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom Force
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

In the following paper (on page 5) is the standard derivation of the force acting on an atom, whose center-of-mass motion is described classically. What I don't understand is the step taken from (5) to (6).

The QM-version of the force is defined using Heisenbergs Equation of Motion (so we are in the Heisenberg picture). Then they write that the force is just the spatial derivative of the Hamiltonian. All OK so far. Then they say that the Hamiltonian is only the part describing the interaction between the atom and the EM-field. This is what I don't agree with. We are in the Heisenberg picture, not the Interaction picture so we need to take into account more than just the interaction Hamiltonian?


Niles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, I actually think I might be right here. However, the reason why they end up only with the dipole interaction is because all the other parts if the Hamiltonian don't have any spatial dependence.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top