EugP
- 104
- 0
The discussion revolves around understanding how to determine the function f(t) when working with Fourier series, particularly in the context of exercises where only a graph is provided. Participants explore the process of defining f(t) from graphical representations and the subsequent steps to evaluate the Fourier series.
Participants generally agree on the need to define f(t) from the graph, but there is no consensus on the specific methods or interpretations of the results, as one participant initially misinterprets their calculations.
The discussion highlights the challenge of translating graphical information into mathematical functions, with specific attention to piecewise functions and the evaluation of integrals. There are unresolved aspects regarding the completeness of calculations and the interpretation of results.
cristo said:Isn't f(t) the function for which you are attempting to find a Fourier series expansion?
Can you not spot an equation for the graph? Why don't you post an example, and it'll be easier to help.EugP said:Yes, but in excersies that I've tried doing, I am not told f(t). I only get a graph usually.
cristo said:Can you not spot an equation for the graph? Why don't you post an example, and it'll be easier to help.
Integral said:Use the graph to define your f(t). This called a piecewise function, it means you will need to break the integrals into pieces which correspond to the different parts of the function.
0 <= t < 50 f(t) = 40
50 <= t < 100 f(t) = 80
100 <= t < 150 f(t) = -40
150<= t <200 f(t) = -80
Now simply evaluate the integrals, using the different segments as that limits for each section.