Understanding Fourier Transforms: Solving Confusion with Even Functions

engcon
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi, I got a problem in which I have to find the Fourier Transform of a function f(t) defined:

f(t) = { 1 - |t|, |t| < 1
0, |t| > 1 }

Well , I found the Fourier transform by working out the integral f(t)e^(-iwt) with the limits being -inf to +inf (and I got the right answer).

Now, since f(t) is an even function, does that mean I can use the Fourier cosine transform?

I tried to work it out and got a different answer, and basically I'm confused? :frown:

Any help is appreciated, thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
yeah i have the same problem here!
 
Yes, the function is even, and so you can use the Fourier cosine transform. However, since you've not posted your solution, I can't see why you're getting a different answer.

eng_pro said:
yeah i have the same problem here!

Your user-name is very similar to the OP's. Coincidence?
 
yes i did it

i used: Fcosine = 2*int (1-t) cos (wt) dt from 0 to1
 
yep it is coincidence..i don't know the OP's username k
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top