Understanding Gaussian Beam Contraction and Divergence in Optics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding Gaussian beam behavior, particularly contraction and divergence. The q parameter's expression indicates that the beam's width, w(z), decreases to a minimum at the beam waist before expanding again, which can occur naturally or with the aid of lenses. The propagation of a collimated beam leads to inevitable expansion, while certain configurations, like Fabry-Perot lasers, can result in beams with decreasing diameters. Additionally, the use of complex functions in optics, such as psi(x,y,z)exp(-jkz), is emphasized for accurately representing beams with non-uniform intensity profiles and varying phase fronts. Overall, the conversation seeks to clarify the mathematical and physical principles behind these optical phenomena.
zebanaqvi
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I am new to lasers. In the expression for q parameter, 1/q = 1/R - j(λ/πw^2)
how did we come to know that w(z) is a measure of decrease in field amplitude E with distance? I can't feel it.

Does the gaussian beam itself contract to the minimum diameter? Shouldn't a lens be required for this? I can understand the divergence of the beam but not the contraction.

Can anybody please make me understand both mathematically and physically?
Regards,
Zeb
 
Physics news on Phys.org
if you "start" with a collimated beam, then it will always expand in diameter.

but sometimes for a variety of reasons you can get a beam that will have beams with decreasing diameter as it propagates until it forms the beams waist and start to expand again.
Such beams are easily created, like you said, with lenses. fabry-perot laser beams sometimes come with a decreasing diameter probably due to the non linearity of the components in the resonator.

does that answer your question?
 
Thanks a lot :)
Sorry, what I am about to ask might be lame.
I have the helmholtz equation, and I want to solution to represent a beam whose phase front is not plane always, whose intensity profile is not uniform across the cross section. What function should I try out? You'll say complex. Something like psi(x,y,z)exp(-jkz) where psi is a complex function. Please explain me why should psi be complex? Is it that only a complex function will be able to represent the desired beam? y?
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top