Understanding General Relativity: Gravity Warping Space-Time

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bobbyam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Weight
Bobbyam
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was an armchair student of physics some time ago, so I appreciate your patience with me. I was on a tour of the lost Atlantic Avenue tunnel in Brooklyn and I'm hoping someone can give me more insight, perhaps an analogy, to help me imagine this better. If I understood him right, this was mind blowing to me because for the first time I could glimpse actually understanding something of general relativity. The tour guide said that the heavier a locomotive is, the less energy is required to maintain its speed. This is because gravity is warping space time, like a bowling ball in a mattress, and the heavier locomotive, having more mass and more gravity, is actually "falling" through a space-time hole. Is this right? Can anyone add to it? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None of that is true, or even vaguely accurate. Sorry.

Most blatantly, the overall premise doesn't make any sense: the more massive a locomotive is, the more energy is required to keep it going---even neglecting high order effects (i.e. the details of the wheels, engine, air-resistance, wheel-track interface, etc).

For instance: how much energy does it take to keep a model train going? Is that more or less than a full size locomotive?

Now, as far as the general relativity: any GR effects for a locomotive staying on the surface of Earth would be extremely negligible. Like, extremely, extremely. Even more importantly, if---for some reason---GR effects were important, they would still make it harder to maintain a given speed for a larger mass.
 
Thank you!
 
Bobbyam said:
Hi, I was an armchair student of physics some time ago, so I appreciate your patience with me. I was on a tour of the lost Atlantic Avenue tunnel in Brooklyn and I'm hoping someone can give me more insight, perhaps an analogy, to help me imagine this better. If I understood him right, this was mind blowing to me because for the first time I could glimpse actually understanding something of general relativity. The tour guide said that the heavier a locomotive is, the less energy is required to maintain its speed. This is because gravity is warping space time, like a bowling ball in a mattress, and the heavier locomotive, having more mass and more gravity, is actually "falling" through a space-time hole. Is this right? Can anyone add to it? Thank you.
So, not knowing the situation, is this locomotive going down in a tunnel or traveling flat in a tunnel?
 
It's supposedly on a perfectly flat grade.
 
Bobbyam said:
It's supposedly on a perfectly flat grade.
In that case I fully agree with zhermes
 

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

B General Relativity and Universal Gravitational Constant
Replies
27
Views
2K
B General Relativity and Gravity?
Replies
13
Views
2K
B Gravity on Earth: Explaining Trampoline Warping & Tides
Replies
3
Views
1K
B Can We Create a Warp Drive for Light? - Josh's Curiousity
Replies
15
Views
2K
I Are Space and Time Just an Illusion in General Relativity?
Replies
6
Views
3K
I Gravity: Compounded Space (Time) Signal?
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Does Relativity Impact Gravity's Influence on Fast-Moving Objects?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I "Exploring Time Perception Across Different Regions of Space"
Replies
20
Views
2K
I 2 objects of enormous volume each in relative motion very close to c
Replies
8
Views
1K
B General Relativity and the curvature of space: more space or less than flat?
2
Replies
62
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top