Understanding Interference Patterns in Three-Slit Diffraction

[kidia]

Anyone can help me on this one.

A plane wave of wavelength \lambda= 550 nm is incident normally on an opaque screen with three narrow parallel slits separated by distance a= 2.3 mm. An interference pattern is observed on the other side of the screen at a large distance from it.
(a)At what angles are the first principal maxima adjacent to the central maximum?
(b)How does intensity, Imax, at the principal maxima compare to that from a single slit, I1?

in (a) can I use asin\theta=m\lambda to get the angle?

 

[BananaMan]

Anyone can help me on this one.

A plane wave of wavelength \lambda= 550 nm is incident normally on an opaque screen with three narrow parallel slits separated by distance a= 2.3 mm. An interference pattern is observed on the other side of the screen at a large distance from it.
(a)At what angles are the first principal maxima adjacent to the central maximum?
(b)How does intensity, Imax, at the principal maxima compare to that from a single slit, I1?

in (a) can I use asin\theta=m\lambda to get the angle?

from my notes (as I am studying this aswell) i believe your answer from (b) should lie... or could possibly be I= N^2 * Io

for a i would use asin\theta=m\lambda as well but I am not so sure on this one, optics isn't exactly my best subject at the moment

 

[kmcf]

For a maximum, the amplitudes will add in phase when a.sin(theta) = lambda, if a is the slit-to-slit spacing. For a minimum, you have to figure out when 3 waves will add to zero. The intensity is proportional to the square of the sum of the amplitudes.