Understanding Lift Generated by Rowing Blades

  • Thread starter Thread starter aeb2335
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of lift generated by rowing blades and how it relates to fluid dynamics. While lift is typically defined as the force perpendicular to fluid flow, the primary force acting on the oar is drag, as it moves through water. The oar acts as a lever, transferring force to the boat, with the boat moving faster than the blade due to its streamlined design. Improved oar designs may create vortices that reduce slippage and enhance performance, suggesting that lift could play a role, albeit secondary to drag. Understanding the angle of attack and optimizing blade shape could further enhance rowing efficiency.
aeb2335
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Here is my question:

To my understanding aerofoils on an airplane air flow moves (horizontally) in the same direction as the motion of the aircraft; the aero foil then creates a pressure difference and an unbalanced force and lift is generated. Rowing blade manufacturers throughout their literature (see link below) talk about lift and angle of attack etc. What I do not understand is that how can you have lift when the direction of motion (the path the blade goes through the water) is largely perpendicular to the leading edge of the blade? Or is the flow that generates lift simply a function of the horizontal component of the water that flows over the blade. Any insight (or things to further research) and how one could being to optimize a blade would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks so much

Disclaimer: I have not taken fluids yet

Link:

http://www.concept2.com/us/oars/pursuit/blade_path.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Lift" is usually defined as the component of the fluiddynamic force perpendicular to the relative fluid flow. The parallel component is called "drag". Even if most of the force on the paddle is drag, there might be a significant lift in some phases of the stroke.

But they also might mean something completely different by "lift", like the vertical to surface component.
 
I agree with post #2. The "lift force" and vortices are not the the main forces propelling the boat, though optimizing them may be a useful secondary effect.

The main force is actually the drag force caused by trying to push a flat plate (the oar blade) backwards through the water, perpendicular to the surface of the plate. The oar works as a lever to transfer the force to the boat. Since a racing boat is much more streamlined than the oar blades, the boat moves forwards much further than the oar blade moves backwards, relative to the water. If you row a heavy dinghy with short oars, the opposite is true!

You can easily see the small amount of motion of the oars trelative to the water if you look at a rowing eight traveling at racing speed. The oars enter and leave the water almost vertically relative to the water, and at every stroke the 8 oars enter a new undisturbed section of water and leave a set of small vortices when they leave the water. Presumably the improved oar design minimizes the energy that is wasted in creating those vortices.
 
I would normally be skeptical of manufacturer's blurb but, bearing in mind that there are a lot of quite bright Engineering and Science types involved in rowing, I guess there may be something in the concept of 'lift'. I think that high performance blades are, in fact, curved. The turbulence would produce low pressure on the forward facing surface of the oar, which would reduce slippage through the water. You 'could' call that lift.
 
If you look at the direction of incoming water that the oar sees, it's clear the oar has a small angle of attack much of the time.
attachment.php?attachmentid=37958&stc=1&d=1313187270.png
 

Attachments

  • oars.png
    oars.png
    1.3 KB · Views: 747
That looks pretty convincing - possible the actual range of angles could be a bit smaller. It is reasonable to suppose that the right shape of curve could produce a useful lowering of pressure on the convex side of the blade - so less slippage. I use a pair of conventional 'seagoing' oars on my 10' tender. They do slip quite a lot - but then, the boat itself is relatively like a brick, compared with a rowing 8. The length of a racing blade will be much greater so that the speed of the boat relative to the stationary (in the water) blade can be high. (A distance multiplier type of lever)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
7K
Back
Top