Understanding Metric Tensor: Time & Spatial Coordinates and Indices

AI Thread Summary
The metric tensor is defined as g=diagonal(1,-1,-1,-1) to create "null distances" for light paths in General Relativity, necessitating the opposite orientation of the time coordinate compared to spatial coordinates. Upper indices represent vectors while lower indices correspond to dual forms, and the metric tensor allows for the conversion between these indices. Raising and lowering indices is essential in classical field theory as it reflects the relationship between tensors in different bases. This framework ensures that the invariant combination t^2-x^2-y^2-z^2 remains consistent under Lorentz transformations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the underlying geometry of spacetime.
nolanp2
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
in my fields course we are using the metric tensor g=diagonal(1,-1,-1,-1), off diagonal(0)
i'm looking for an explanation of why the time coordinate has to be orientated oppositely to the spatial coordinates. can anyone give me an explanation of this?

i'm also lost with upper and lower indices. i don't understand why multiplying a lower index by the metric tensor gives an upper index.

any help appreciated, thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The simple answer is that by defining the metric tensor that way, there are "null distances" of length zero which correspond to path that light rays travel. It does not *have* to be defined that way, but in the General Theory of Relativity, it can be defined that way.

The upper and lower indices are more subtle- they are not, in general, movable. Upper indices correspond to vectors, lower indices correspond to forms. If a metric tensor can be defined on a generic geometry, then it is possible to move them up and down.

Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler's book "Gravitation" is an excellent way to get started understanding this stuff.
 
so the upper and lower indices are like dual spaces? what advantage is there to raising indices, why is it necessary that they be used in Classical field theory?
 
The basic reason for the "indefinite metric", with time having the opposite sign from space, is that the combination t^2-x^2-y^2-z^2 is an invariant under Lorentz transformation.
The two types of indices, upper and lower, is a relatively simple way to incorporate this.
 
nolanp2 said:
so the upper and lower indices are like dual spaces? what advantage is there to raising indices, why is it necessary that they be used in Classical field theory?

Yes the upper indexed components are the components of some vector in some basis. The lower indexed components are the components of it's dual vector in some dual basis.

The metric tensor maps a vector to it's dual.

Index gymnastics is just a way in that the relationship between tensors refelcts the relationship between their components in different bases.
 

Thread 'The Effect of Linear and Rotational Motion on Measured Weight'

Consider an extremely long and perfectly calibrated scale. A car with a mass of 1000 kg is placed on it, and the scale registers this weight accurately. Now, suppose the car begins to move, reaching very high speeds. Neglecting air resistance and rolling friction, if the car attains, for example, a velocity of 500 km/h, will the scale still indicate a weight corresponding to 1000 kg, or will the measured value decrease as a result of the motion? In a second scenario, imagine a person with a...
View full post »

Thread 'Coulomb gauge implies instantaneous radial electric field?'

Scalar and vector potentials in Coulomb gauge Assume Coulomb gauge so that $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A}=0.\tag{1}$$ The scalar potential ##\phi## is described by Poisson's equation $$\nabla^2 \phi = -\frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\tag{2}$$ which has the instantaneous general solution given by $$\phi(\mathbf{r},t)=\frac{1}{4\pi\varepsilon_0}\int \frac{\rho(\mathbf{r}',t)}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}d^3r'.\tag{3}$$ In Coulomb gauge the vector potential ##\mathbf{A}## is given by...
View full post »
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'

I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
View full post »

Similar threads

I How do non-diagonal indices of a metric allow for local flatness?
Replies
22
Views
451
I How to calculate basis vectors from metric tensor (as a matrix)?
Replies
6
Views
448
A Ricci tensor for Fermi normal coordinates
Replies
1
Views
850
I How do Tensors "work" in relation to linear algebraic objects?
Replies
7
Views
312
Maple Physics Package Question: Trouble contracting indices
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Purpose of Tensors, Indices in Tensor Calculus Explained
Replies
10
Views
3K
On the order of indices of the Christoffel symbol of the 1st kind
Replies
19
Views
2K
I Symbol for matrix representative of a tensor
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Co- and Contravariance
Replies
5
Views
1K
A How to Express the Schwarzschild Metric in Fermi Normal Coordinates?
Replies
13
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top