Understanding Momentum Conservation in a Closed System: A Question Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter pete5383
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum
AI Thread Summary
In a closed system without external forces, momentum is conserved, meaning that when a person jumps, they impart momentum to the Earth in the opposite direction. As the person reaches the peak of their jump and begins to descend, gravitational forces act to reverse the motion of both the person and the Earth, ensuring the net momentum remains zero. The downward force exerted when landing does not exceed the force applied during the jump, as both are countered by gravitational attraction. The discussion highlights the importance of considering gravitational interactions in understanding momentum conservation. Overall, the gravitational pull between the person and the Earth is crucial in maintaining momentum balance throughout the jump and landing process.
pete5383
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I was pondering something as I lie in bed...so in a system with no outside forces, momentum has to be conserved, correct? So let's say me and the Earth are the system, and initially at rest, so we have zero momentum. I jump up in the air, giving myself momentum in the positive y direction, while the Earth has momentum equal to mine in the negative y direction (going down, even though it's very very slight). No, once I reach the peak of my jump, I start coming down, that is, the sign of my momentum has changed. Does this mean that at that moment the Earth starts to move back towards me to maintain a net momentum of zero? Also, it seems to me when I land I will be pushing the Earth down even more, making the net momentum afterwards non-zero. Can anyone explain to me where my thinking is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pete5383 said:
Ok, so I was pondering something as I lie in bed...so in a system with no outside forces, momentum has to be conserved, correct? So let's say me and the Earth are the system, and initially at rest, so we have zero momentum. I jump up in the air, giving myself momentum in the positive y direction, while the Earth has momentum equal to mine in the negative y direction (going down, even though it's very very slight). No, once I reach the peak of my jump, I start coming down, that is, the sign of my momentum has changed. Does this mean that at that moment the Earth starts to move back towards me to maintain a net momentum of zero?
Yes
Also, it seems to me when I land I will be pushing the Earth down even more, making the net momentum afterwards non-zero. Can anyone explain to me where my thinking is wrong?
When you jump up, the Earth recoils a very small amount. But as you move away from the earth, there is a gravitational force between you and the Earth that slows and eventually reverses the motion of the Earth and of you. You and the Earth then move toward each other and collide, thereby providing an impulse to each sufficient to stop further motion so that each has 0 momentum. I am not sure why you think that when this collision occurs, you will be pushing the Earth even more than when you jumped. You necessarily have the same speed when you left the Earth as when you collided with it.

AM
 
When pete5382 said "pushing the Earth down even more" he didn't mean that the force landing on the Earth was greater than that jumping. He meant that there was a force, downward) when he jumped and then the same force(downward) again when he landed (so he was applying "even more" force). Of course, as you say, he is missing the pull of gravity. The reason he stops going up and starts coming down is because the force of gravity is pulling him toward the earth. At the same time, the mass of his body is pulling the Earth toward him. It's very small of course, but then the push he gives the Earth when he jumps is very small. Anyway, the two downward pushes he gives the Earth when he jumps and when he lands are exactly offset by the gravitational force his mass applies to the earth.
 
Ahhhhhh, I was forgetting about the gravitational attraction between us...duh...hehe. That makes sense to me now. That's what I get for posting at 2 in the morning. But thank you all very much!
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top