Understanding Newton's 2nd Law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Newton's 2nd Law to a problem involving a frictionless pulley and two masses. It clarifies that the acceleration of the two masses, a1 and a2, are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction, leading to the constraint a1 = -a2. The equations derived from the forces acting on each mass are essential for solving the problem, specifically m1a1 = T1 - m1g and m2a2 = T2 - m2g. The relationship between tensions T1 and T2, as dictated by Newton's 3rd Law, simplifies the analysis. Understanding the free body diagrams for each mass is crucial for setting up the equations correctly.
I'm Awesome
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I have a problem which reads:

A frictionless pulley with zero mass is attached to the ceiling, in a gravity field of 9.81 m/s2 . Mass M2 = 0.10 kg is observed to be accelerating downward at 1.3 m/s2

and I have a solution which tells me to solve the problem use Newton's 2nd law:

m1a1 = T1 - m1g

m2a2 = T2 - m2g

We also have an acceleration (constraint/constant??) a1 = a2 = a, and by Newton's 3rd law, T1 = T2

=> m1 (a+g) = m2 (g-a) => m1 = [(g - a)/(g + a)]m2

and then from this we just plug in numbers.My question is, how do we arrive to the conclusion of creating this equation? I'm really confused about how to actually set up the equation. Also is a1 and a2 the same acceleration just in opposite directions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm Awesome said:
how do we arrive to the conclusion of creating this equation?
Just draw the free body diagram for each mass. Everything else follows from those and the constraints you mentioned.
 
I'm Awesome said:
Also is a1 and a2 the same acceleration just in opposite directions?
Yes. The acceleration constraint should be a1 = - a2. Let "a" be the magnitude of that acceleration.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top