Understanding Non-Zero Velocity vs. Non-Zero Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maroc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Velocity Zero
AI Thread Summary
Non-zero velocity indicates an object's speed and direction, while non-zero acceleration refers to a change in that speed or direction. For example, a train at rest has both zero velocity and zero acceleration. When the train starts moving, it has zero velocity but non-zero acceleration as it begins to speed up. Once it reaches a constant speed, it maintains non-zero velocity with zero acceleration. Understanding these distinctions clarifies how motion is described in physics.
Maroc
Gold Member
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Not a homework question - Just wondering.

What is the real meaning of non-zero velocity compared to non-zero acceleration like i don't really understand the difference. Anyone care to explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maroc said:
Not a homework question - Just wondering.

What is the real meaning of non-zero velocity compared to non-zero acceleration like i don't really understand the difference. Anyone care to explain?

non-zero *anything* just means that *anything* is not 0. Is there something more you're asking about?
 
Imagine you are on a train. If it is sitting at the station, not moving, that would be a zero velocity AND zero acceleration. The instant it takes off from the station, it will have a zero-VELOCITY, but a non-zero Acceleration. As it continues to accelerate it will have a non-zero velocity AND a non-zero acceleration. Once it reaches it's cruising speed, if there is nothing effecting the train, it will have a non-zero velocity but a ZERO ACCELERATION.

Let me know if this helps.
 
That is perfect guys. I was over thinking the concept.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top