Understanding Normalization in Gaussian Inputs

AI Thread Summary
Normalization in Gaussian inputs refers to the process of transforming a Gaussian distribution into a standard form, specifically N(0,1), while maintaining the underlying probabilities. By defining a new variable t = T/To, the Gaussian input can be expressed in a dimensionless form, simplifying calculations. The normalized function U(0,t) = exp(-t^2/2) represents the probability density function of the standardized normal distribution. This transformation is useful as it allows for easier integration and application in various statistical contexts, including the error function. Understanding normalization is essential for accurate probability analysis and mathematical modeling.
zak8000
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
what does normalization mean?

for example say i have the guassian input as :

A(0,T) = \sqrt{Po}*exp(-T^2/2To^2)

then we can normalize it by defining t=T/To and A(z,T) = \sqrt{Po}U(z,t)

Po= peak power t= normalized to the input pulse width To. if the peak of the pulse is (arbirtarily) set in t=T=0, we have U(z=0,t=0)=1 . with these notations both t and U are now dimensionless and the normalized form the gaussin input can be written as:

U(0,t) = exp(-t^2/2)

i am just a bit confused as to what this means. in the normalized form the peak power dissappears and why is the normalized form uselfull is it because it makes calculations easier?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
zak8000 said:
what does normalization mean?

for example say i have the guassian input as :

A(0,T) = \sqrt{Po}*exp(-T^2/2To^2)

then we can normalize it by defining t=T/To and A(z,T) = \sqrt{Po}U(z,t)

Po= peak power t= normalized to the input pulse width To. if the peak of the pulse is (arbirtarily) set in t=T=0, we have U(z=0,t=0)=1 . with these notations both t and U are now dimensionless and the normalized form the gaussin input can be written as:

U(0,t) = exp(-t^2/2)

i am just a bit confused as to what this means. in the normalized form the peak power dissappears and why is the normalized form uselfull is it because it makes calculations easier?

Hey zak8000.

Normalization in this context of a probability density function for a normal distribution means taking a distribution that relates to N(μ,σ2) to N(0,1) while preserving the probabilities for the un-standardized LHS.

When you introduce t = T/To, you get this standardization but to preserve the behaviour, what happens is that the limits change just like you would have in any integral substition for a definite integral.

In short: U(0,t) = exp(-t^2/2) reflects the PDF (need to multiply by 1/SQRT(2pi)) of the standardized normal and this also reflects what is known as the error function which is used in many different contexts.

You should probably take a look at anything that describes the error function and for probability applications look at the topic of 'standardizing normal distributions'.
 
ok thank you will look into it
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top