Understanding Parabolas: What's the Importance of Canonical Form?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding the canonical form of a parabola, y = a(x-h)² + k, is crucial for identifying its vertex at (h, k) and determining its direction of opening based on the sign of 'a'. The value of 'a' also affects the width of the parabola; larger absolute values make it appear skinnier, while smaller values make it flatter. Completing the square is necessary to convert a standard quadratic equation into this canonical form, allowing for easier interpretation of its properties. The discussion also clarifies how to use zeros and intercepts in the equation, emphasizing that the vertex coordinates are derived from the values of 'h' and 'k'. Overall, mastering these concepts enhances the understanding and enjoyment of working with parabolas.
ElectroNewby
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Okay I want to be clear, this is not an homework question.

But I have a hard time understanding the concept of what I'm going to show you. The teacher goes way to fast for me, honestly, and when we ask a question it's just like he doesn't want to take the time to make us understand, kinda makes me feel stupid.

So I'm writing me question with the hopes that you can point me a tutorial (hopefully video) or if you are good in the subject and can help me a little. I just want to grip the concept so I can have fun doing those because I'd understand...

[PLAIN]http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/396/interrogations.jpg

I believe there an equation that's like y = a (x - h)² + b
You know, I think I understand 80% of that factorization thing, but I have no clue about the parabola.

Things I'd like to know and remember:

- How to know if the parabola is pointing and how much is it "open" (I hope you understand what I mean).
- How to place the parabola at the good place (the - h thing lost me).
- The canonical form, what's the big deal ? Why can't it be simpler :|

I'm sorry if this is a stupid question but when I look at my notes it's all just whatever (the teacher goes so fast, I spend the time writing wh he writes on the chalkboard but I can't follow)

thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, y = a(x-h)2+ k is a standard form for a parabola opening up or down. You can read important properties from this equation:

Vertex is at (h,k)
Opens up or down if a > 0 or a < 0, respectively
The larger |a| is the quicker y gets large as you vary x, making the parabola appear "skinnier".

Since these properties are so easily read from the equation, that is why the standard form is used. To get an equation in standard form if it isn't already, you complete the square. Here's a step by step example.

y = 3x2+12x+11

Factor the 3 out of the x terms:
y = 3(x2 + 4x) + 11
Complete the square inside the parentheses by adding and subtracting 4
y = 3((x2 + 4x+ 4) - 4) + 11
=3((x + 2)2 -4) + 11 = 3(x + 2)2 - 12 + 11 = 3(x + 2)2 - 1

Now you have the standard form and you can read the vertex as (-2,-1) and see it opens up.
 
there are some general things to know about functions:

f(x-h) translates (shifts, or moves) the function f(x) h units to the right.

(if h < 0, it is more convenient to use -h, so f(x+h) translates f(x) h units to the left).

f(x) + k translates (shifts, or moves) the function f(x) k units up.

(again, this assumes k > 0. if k < 0, we have:

f(x) - k moves f(x) k units down).

so

y = f(x-h) + k, is the same as:

y' = f(x'), where:

y' = y-k
x' = x-h

or, equivalently:

y = y'+k
x = x'+h

so y = f(x-h) + k "looks just like" y = f(x), except the origin is now at (h,k).

so really, whenever we have:

y = a(x-h)2 + k,

we have the parabola y = ax2 moved to have its vertex at (h,k) (a change of coordinates).

figuring out what "h" is, is where one needs to "complete the square". LCKurtz's post is an eloquent demonstration of how to do this.

every other "qualitative" (behavioral) aspect of a parabola, is controlled by a. if a > 0, it "opens up", if a < 0, it "opens down". the size of a determines how "fast it grows", large |a| parabolas grow fast, and look "skinny", small |a| parabolas grow slow, and look "flat".
 
Thank you sooooo much for your explanations

I need a few precisions if you don't mind !

I lost you here! The 4 you added and sunstracted ? Why can you do this ?
LCKurtz said:
Complete the square inside the parentheses by adding and subtracting 4
y = 3((x²2 + 4x+ 4) - 4) + 11
=3((x + 2)² -4) + 11
= 3(x + 2)² - 12 + 11
= 3(x + 2)2 - 1

LCKurtz said:
you can read the vertex as (-2,-1)
Is it -2 because of the "-h" in y = a (x-h)² + k ?

LCKurtz said:
The larger |a| is the quicker y gets large as you vary x, making the parabola appear "skinnier".
I understand now! If a was say 1/100 it would almost apear flat if we zoom in ?
If I understand, say a is 1000 the parabola would look like a straight line going up ? (actually 2 lines very close).

Deveno said:
every other "qualitative" (behavioral) aspect of a parabola, is controlled by a. if a > 0, it "opens up", if a < 0, it "opens down". the size of a determines how "fast it grows", large |a| parabolas grow fast, and look "skinny", small |a| parabolas grow slow, and look "flat".
Well I think you answered my question just above heheh

One thing I'm not sure is, where do I use my zeros in the equation ?
I have a couple of zeros, like -5, -3 and o.o, -30 in my example above.

I see that -5 and -3 are for zero Y.
But I don't understand the o.o (origin ordonate). I suppose the -30 is Y for X = 0.

Do I plug it in y= a(x-h)²+k
-30 = a (0 -h)² + k ?

I would then resolve the other equation for my h and k, right ? :)
 
also, can a = 0 ?
 
ElectroNewby said:
Thank you sooooo much for your explanations

I need a few precisions if you don't mind !

I lost you here! The 4 you added and sunstracted ? Why can you do this ?
You need a 4 to complete the square and you have to subtract it back out or you have changed the equation.
Is it -2 because of the "-h" in y = a (x-h)² + k ?
Yes
I understand now! If a was say 1/100 it would almost apear flat if we zoom in ?
If I understand, say a is 1000 the parabola would look like a straight line going up ? (actually 2 lines very close).
Yes, assuming you don't change the scale of the axes.
Well I think you answered my question just above heheh

One thing I'm not sure is, where do I use my zeros in the equation ?
I have a couple of zeros, like -5, -3 and o.o, -30 in my example above.

I see that -5 and -3 are for zero Y.
But I don't understand the o.o (origin ordonate). I suppose the -30 is Y for X = 0.

Do I plug it in y= a(x-h)²+k
-30 = a (0 -h)² + k ?

I would then resolve the other equation for my h and k, right ? :)

When x = h, the squared term is the least it can get so that is the x coordinate of the vertex and k is the y coordinate. Of course, the parabola might not even go through the origin (0,0). You get the x and y intercepts by setting y or x = 0 as usual.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top