Understanding Particle Energies in Ohanian's Book: A Potential Problem Explored

  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
I saw today in Ohanian's book:
"It is convenient to separate particle energies into kinetic and rest mass energies:
M=∑m +(∑T/c^2 +U/c^2)
The term in the paranthesis is negative for a bound system,hence the total mass is less than the sum of the particle rest masses"
I thought the rest masses were indeed less.If it is otherwise, there's a problem with the Energy momentum four vector
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
vin300 said:
I saw today in Ohanian's book:
"It is convenient to separate particle energies into kinetic and rest mass energies:
M=?m +(?T/c^2 +U/c^2)
The term in the paranthesis is negative for a bound system,hence the total mass is less than the sum of the particle rest masses"
This is correct. The "missing" mass is called the "mass deficit" and that mass/c^2 is called the "binding energy". Note, the mass deficit only appears when the binding energy has been removed from the system, usually either through radiation or through doing work on another system.
vin300 said:
I thought the rest masses were indeed less.If it is otherwise, there's a problem with the Energy momentum four vector
The problem goes away if you include the four-momentum of the binding energy which left the system.
 
Last edited:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top