Understanding physics without lab work

AI Thread Summary
Understanding physics effectively requires both mathematical proficiency and practical experimental skills. While some individuals excel in theoretical aspects, they may struggle with hands-on experimentation, which is essential for fully grasping physical phenomena. The discussion highlights the distinction between two types of physicists: those who focus on mathematical theory and those who engage in practical experimentation. It emphasizes that success in physics often hinges on teamwork, as modern scientific endeavors increasingly require collaboration between theorists and experimentalists. Additionally, it points out that difficulties in laboratory settings may stem from a lack of experience rather than a lack of intelligence or capability. Ultimately, developing experimental skills through practice is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of physics.
alex77
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Can you understand physics if you are good in math and suck at proving something practical?I tried to do that and it only worked in hs.I have never realized that i need materials to do the trick.Do you need a lab to see what happens and than explain the phenomenum or you can apply math without lab materials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure whether this helps, but a professor of mine used to say: "There are basically two types of physicists. One part are mathematicians, and the others are locksmiths." Needles to say he was a mathematician.
Personally I doubt that e.g. Einstein or Schrödinger have been good on practical tasks.
 
fresh_42 said:
"There are basically two types of physicists. One part are mathematicians, and the others are locksmiths.
Locksmith as in a dumb,retarded person?
 
alex77 said:
Locksmith as in a dumb,retarded person?
No, not at all. Simply a person that works with his hands. Experimentalists can and often are very gifted. And some experiments require real smartness. It is just so, that often these two talents don't come together in the same person. Modern science is more and more a matter of team work, as experiments as well as theoretic models get more sophisticated and complex. You don't have to be good on everything, but you probably should have experiences and knowledge about both sides of the coin.
 
First off - how do you know you "suck at proving something practical?"

Often I think people mischaracterise themselves. Some kids walk into a physics lab and have trouble not because they don't have the capacity or intelligence or drive to do well, but because they simply haven't ever used an oscilloscope, or propagated errors or spent any time tinkering with something that didn't work right the first time. Laboratory work requires skills, not just knowledge, to do well. And the only way you get those skills (as with any skills) is through practice.

To be successful in physics you need a certain base level of experimental skills and experience. So yes, at some point you have to do the experiments.
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Back
Top