Understanding Polarity and Standard Labeling in KCL and KVL Exercises

  • Thread starter Thread starter thuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Defining polarities for resistors is crucial in KCL and KVL exercises, as moving from negative to positive results in a positive term and vice versa. Consistency in labeling currents and nodes is essential, and annotating diagrams with clear current directions helps maintain clarity. Both power sources in a circuit can contribute to the current, and it's important to stick with the initial current definitions throughout the problem. The polarity can be chosen arbitrarily, but the defined conventions must be adhered to for accurate results. Establishing these definitions at the start is vital to avoid confusion in calculations.
thuc
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,
I'm having some troubles while doing KCL and KVL exercies. I have two question:
1. Do I have to define the polarities of resistors and how to do that ?
2. When do i need to use the STANDARD LABELING ?
For example in this exercie
1.png
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The way I do it is, when writing, for instance, a loop equation, moving from - to + results in a positive term, and moving from + to - results in a negative term. Pick your currents at the beginning of the problem and stick with them. The voltage drop in a resistor due to a current always goes from + to -. It just takes some practice to get used to it.
 
oh thanks, but I have another question: when i have 2 power sources which power source will generate the current ?
for example in this exercie
3.png
 
thuc said:
oh thanks, but I have another question: when i have 2 power sources which power source will generate the current ?
for example in this exercie View attachment 96046
They both can contribute. Can you show us the KCL equation that you get by writing that the sum of all currents leaving the center node is equal to zero?
 
axmls said:
Pick your currents at the beginning of the problem and stick with them.
Yes. Annotate the diagram with I1, I2,I3 etc (with arrows) and give all the nodes numbers. It's essential to be totally consistent throughout. The 'polarity' can be any way you want because the answer will yield the correct sign, whichever.
 
There is a similarity with problems involving motion. The sign of the answer only makes sense when taken together with the definitions you make at the outset (eg "I define UP as positive"). If you don't make those definitions before writing KCL/KVL equations you will come unstuck.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
While I was rolling out a shielded cable, a though came to my mind - what happens to the current flow in the cable if there came a short between the wire and the shield in both ends of the cable? For simplicity, lets assume a 1-wire copper wire wrapped in an aluminum shield. The wire and the shield has the same cross section area. There are insulating material between them, and in both ends there is a short between them. My first thought, the total resistance of the cable would be reduced...