Understanding Pole Speed in Digital Control System Design

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the design of a State Observer in digital control systems, specifically the relationship between observer poles and controller poles. Participants explore the implications of pole speed in the context of mapping between the s-plane and z-plane, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects of digital control design.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that observer poles should be approximately 10 times faster than controller poles, questioning how this translates in the digital domain.
  • Another participant explains that vertical lines in the s-plane correspond to circles in the z-plane, indicating stability regions based on pole placement.
  • A proposed method for determining observer poles involves mapping controller poles to the s-plane, adjusting their real parts, and then mapping back to the z-plane, though this raises concerns about affecting the damping ratio.
  • There is acknowledgment that while one can map poles back and forth, the implications on damping ratios must be considered.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of adjusting pole locations, particularly regarding the impact on damping ratios. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best approach for determining observer poles in digital control systems.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering both the real parts of poles and their damping ratios when adjusting pole locations. The discussion involves mathematical mappings that depend on the sampling period, which may introduce additional complexities.

NeuralNet
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
When designing a State Observer for a control system the observer poles (eig(A-LC)) should typically be about 10 times faster than the controller poles (eig(A-BK)).

But when designing a digital control system what does it mean for the poles to be faster? For the analog case it simply means that to get more negative on the real axis, but since the s-plane is mapped to the z-plane, how does one determine how a pole is faster?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Vertical lines in the s-plane (real part = constant) maps to circles of constant radius in the z-plane with the origin as their center.

In the z-plane, as you move from within the unit circle to outside of it, you move from the stable region to the unstable, i.e. the time constant of the pole(s) increase in magnitude as you move away from the origin.
 
Okay, so the mapping from the s-plane to z-plane is as follows:
z=e^{sT}

And from s-plane to z-plane:
s=\frac{1}{T}ln(z)

Where T is the sampling period.

So if the observer poles are supposed to be "10 time faster" than the controller poles can I do the following, given a digital control system:
1. Determine the controller poles.
2. Map them to the s-plane.
4. Take the real part of the poles and multiply by 10. These will be the continuous Observer Poles.
5. Map the continuous observer poles back to the z-plane. These are the discrete Observer Poles.

Would that work?
 
Last edited:
NeuralNet said:
1. Determine the observer poles.
The "controller poles" yeah?

NeuralNet said:
4. Take the real part of the poles and multiply by 10. These will be the continuous Observer Poles.
You're going to affect the damping ratio of the poles as well if you do that. You can move them out along a loci of constant damping ratio (constant angle) until you get the time constant you want.

But yes, you're free to map back and forth as you please.
 
milesyoung said:
The "controller poles" yeah?

Yes, I meant "controller poles" (which I have edited).


You have answered my question. Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
40K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K