Understanding Quantum Computing: Unanswered Questions

MikeFromOhio
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I've been reading "Programming the Universe" by Seth Lloyd, a quantum computer scientist. He goes on and on about the power of quantum computers and their ability, for example, to factor large numbers using massive parallelism. He also states that quantum parallelism is different than classical parallelism. In the quantum case, he says, the individual quantum bits (or qbits) are interfering with each other which is helpful.

A quantum computer of 4 qbits, he says, can be carrying out 2**4 or 16 tasks simultaneously. So if your trying to factor the number 20, one task might be trying out 6*3 which does not equal 20 while another task might be trying 4*5 which does.

What he does not explain is:

1) How does the Quantum Computer carry out the multiplication for a given qbit task?

2) If interference is important, then how do the separate trials interfere which each other? And how do failed tasks (6*3) interfere with the tasks which are successful (4*5) ?

3) How does the Quantum Computer know when it is done?

Any feedback on these questions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mike
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's a report of an actual experiment last year which used Shor's algorithm to factor 15:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.1242

http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/40306
 
Unusualname, thanks for the links.
I can see that it's a bit hard to explain.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top