Understanding RC Circuit Currents: A Homework Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a homework problem related to an RC circuit with specific resistor and capacitor values. The primary focus is on determining the current through resistor R1 immediately after the switch is closed, with the user struggling to apply Kirchhoff's Laws correctly. It is clarified that the voltage across resistor R0 is not equal to the total voltage V, as it is distributed across the entire circuit. Users suggest using Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to derive the correct equations and also mention the potential divider method as a simpler alternative. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding circuit analysis techniques to accurately calculate currents in RC circuits.
smithisize
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm really looking for help with A.) because I think that if I could figure out A.) the rest should be ok. So, here are all parts of the question, but I'm really only concerned with A at the moment!

The diagram below depicts an RC-circuit where C = 5.40 F, R0 = 14.5Ω , R1 = 24.5 Ω, R2 = 27.5 Ω, and V = 7.50 Volts. The capacitor is initially uncharged.

6ozouc.gif


This is how I drew my currents etc:

35m2iw5.gif


The circles are for Kirchoff Loops I tried to construct, and they're going clockwise. Along with a loop around the outside of the circuit.

A.) What is the current through R1 immediately after the switch S is closed?
B.) What is the current through R2 immediately after the switch S is closed?
C.) What is the current through the capacitor immediately after the switch S is closed?
D.) What is the current through R1 after the switch S has been closed for a very long time? Assume that the battery does not go dead.
E.)
What is the current through R2 after the switch S has been closed for a very long time? Assume that the battery does not go dead.

Homework Equations



V=IR
C=(Q/V)


The Attempt at a Solution


According to Kirchoff's Laws: I1= I2 + I3
So, since V=IR and R1 and R2 are || : I1 = (Vparallel/R1)+(Vparallel/R2) --> I1= V*(1/R1 + 1/R2)
Therefore: I1/(1/R2 + 1/R1) = Vparallel. Where I1 = V/R0.
Then, I2 = Vparallel/R1

But, that's not correct unfortunately. Where am I going wrong? Thanks!

Side note, here are the eqns I got from kirchhoffs laws (pretty sure I messed something up):

V - I1R0 - I2R1 = 0 Left loop
-I4R4 + I2R1 = 0 Right loop at t=0 (or basically zero) Also, I4=I3.
V-I1R0-I4R2 = 0 Entire loop again at t=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
smithisize said:

Homework Statement



I'm really looking for help with A.) because I think that if I could figure out A.) the rest should be ok. So, here are all parts of the question, but I'm really only concerned with A at the moment!

The diagram below depicts an RC-circuit where C = 5.40 F, R0 = 14.5Ω , R1 = 24.5 Ω, R2 = 27.5 Ω, and V = 7.50 Volts. The capacitor is initially uncharged.

6ozouc.gif


This is how I drew my currents etc:

35m2iw5.gif


The circles are for Kirchoff Loops I tried to construct, and they're going clockwise. Along with a loop around the outside of the circuit.

A.) What is the current through R1 immediately after the switch S is closed?
B.) What is the current through R2 immediately after the switch S is closed?
C.) What is the current through the capacitor immediately after the switch S is closed?
D.) What is the current through R1 after the switch S has been closed for a very long time? Assume that the battery does not go dead.
E.)
What is the current through R2 after the switch S has been closed for a very long time? Assume that the battery does not go dead.

Homework Equations



V=IR
C=(Q/V)


The Attempt at a Solution


According to Kirchoff's Laws: I1= I2 + I3
So, since V=IR and R1 and R2 are || : I1 = (Vparallel/R1)+(Vparallel/R2) --> I1= V*(1/R1 + 1/R2)
Therefore: I1/(1/R2 + 1/R1) = Vparallel. Where I1 = V/R0.
Then, I2 = Vparallel/R1

But, that's not correct unfortunately. Where am I going wrong? Thanks!
Hi smithisize; Welcome to Physics Forums.

I1 ≠ V/R0. The potential across resistor R0 is not V; Potential V is dropped across the sum of R0 and R1||R2, so all of V cannot be across just Ro.

You could use your KVL system of equations to determine the individual currents.

Or calculate the total resistance first and use it to find the current I1. With I1 in hand you can then use your other relationships to proceed.
 
gneill said:
Hi smithisize; Welcome to Physics Forums.

I1 ≠ V/R0. The potential across resistor R0 is not V; Potential V is dropped across the sum of R0 and R1||R2, so all of V cannot be across just Ro.

You could use your KVL system of equations to determine the individual currents.

Or calculate the total resistance first and use it to find the current I1. With I1 in hand you can then use your other relationships to proceed.
Thanks, I appreciate it.

So, I think I should probably become more familiar with using the KVL sys of eqns. Not my strong point.

Given the eqns I posted above, I substituted I2+I3 for I1 then solved for I3 (using the 1st eqn) and got I3 = (V - I2R0)/(R0+R2)
Then I plugged that value into my third equation and solved for I2 and got I2 = (R2*V)/(R0+R1*R2+R1*R0)
Evaluated: .19765 A

Does that look correct??

EDIT: Well, I was able to solve for I1, and in turn solve for I2. I2 ended up being .144 A. So, which of my eqns is wrong? Where is my KVL going awry?
 
Last edited:
smithisize said:
Thanks, I appreciate it.

So, I think I should probably become more familiar with using the KVL sys of eqns. Not my strong point.

Given the eqns I posted above, I substituted I2+I3 for I1 then solved for I3 (using the 1st eqn) and got I3 = (V - I2R0)/(R0+R2)
Then I plugged that value into my third equation and solved for I2 and got I2 = (R2*V)/(R0+R1*R2+R1*R0)
Evaluated: .19765 A

Does that look correct??
No, something's gone wrong in your manipulations. Note that the denominator of your last expression has a resistance term added to resistance2 terms --- can't add mixed units!
EDIT: Well, I was able to solve for I1, and in turn solve for I2. I2 ended up being .144 A. So, which of my eqns is wrong? Where is my KVL going awry?
0.144A is a good result.
 
While you can use KVL & KCL (and it might be good practice to do so) I probably would have treated this as a variant of a potential divider circuit to work out the voltage on R1 and from that the currents

For example, initially the capacitor is discharged so..

VR1 = V * (R1//R2) / {(R1//R2) + R0}

IR1 = VR1 / R1
 
Well thanks to both of you for your replies, really helped me out!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top