Understanding Reference Frames: Generality & Abstractions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the generality and abstraction of reference frames in physics, questioning whether vectors in one frame can exist in another and the relationship between different frames. It explores the idea that reference frames can be likened to different sets of coordinate axes, suggesting that transitions between them may involve spatial and rotational translations. The concept of a vector being zero in one frame, such as the gravity vector in a free-fall frame, is highlighted. Additionally, it mentions that in special relativity, transformations between inertial frames include translations, spatial rotations, and boosts, which account for motion relative to a base frame. The conversation emphasizes the complexity and interconnectivity of reference frames in understanding physical phenomena.
nanoWatt
Messages
85
Reaction score
2
I am wondering about the generality of reference frames, and how abstract they can be.

Is it possible for a vector in one reference frame to not exist in another frame? Or is there always a relation between two reference frames?

Also, are two reference frames like two different sets of coordinate axes? I mean can you always get from one reference frame to another just by knowing the position and or rotation values?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think one vector in one frame can be zero in another frame. For example, in a free fall frame, the gravity vector is juxt zero.
 
Ok, I think what I meant to say is,

Can a reference frame A always be represented in terms of reference frame B only by having a spatial and a rotational translation?
 
nanoWatt said:
Ok, I think what I meant to say is,

Can a reference frame A always be represented in terms of reference frame B only by having a spatial and a rotational translation?

In special relativity the transformations between inertial frames are translation, spatial rotation and boosts. Boosts are rotations that mix space and time and represent a frame that is moving wrt the base frame.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top