Understanding Refractive Phase Differences in Electromagnetic Waves

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of a refractive medium on the phase and frequency of electromagnetic waves, specifically in the context of comparing wave propagation through a vacuum versus a medium. Participants explore the implications of refractive indices on phase differences, photon detection rates, and the nature of electromagnetic waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how the phase difference between two detectors evolves over time when one is in a medium and the other is in a vacuum, wondering if it results in a constant phase shift or a change in angular frequency.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the wavelength changes in a medium due to the refractive index, the frequency remains constant.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the relationship between photon detection rates and frequency, proposing that a slower speed of light in a medium might imply a change in the frequency of detected photons.
  • Some participants emphasize that the frequency of light does not change when passing through a medium, reiterating that only the wavelength is affected.
  • One participant seeks a deeper understanding of the physical mechanism behind wavelength changes in a medium, asking for an explanation beyond geometric optics.
  • A later reply suggests a classical explanation involving the interaction of electromagnetic waves with charges in the medium, which delays the wave's progress.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the frequency of electromagnetic waves remains constant while passing through a medium, but there is ongoing debate regarding the implications of this on photon detection and the nature of phase shifts. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact physical mechanisms at play.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the assumptions made about the relationship between speed, frequency, and photon detection rates. The discussion also highlights the dependence on the definitions of terms like "phase shift" and "wavelength" in different contexts.

ajdecker1022
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering about small changes of phase due to a refractive medium. For example, suppose there is an emitter of radio or light waves, and two detectors equidistant from the emitter. One of the detectors is behind a medium, while the other is a straight shot through a vacuum.

How would the difference in the detectors evolve over time? Would it just be a constant phase shift, or would the angular frequency of the refracted wave change?
How can I think about this properly?

Thanks in advance.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Draw a diagram ... if one wave is subject to a refractive medium it will have a change of wavelength in that medium because v=c/n, but the frequency will not change.

The one through vacuum has n=1, so v=c and there is no refraction.
 
Hmm, perhaps my question was not explained well. The detector behind the medium is not in the medium. I know that the wavelength and the velocity will change, but I'm not sure whether the detected phase change will by proportional to time or constant. My confusion is coming from two perspectives:

1. As an analogy, the speed of the convoy is the slowest ship. Since the speed of light is slowed through the medium, all of the light going through the medium should travel at a slower rate. Let's say that that in the vacuum, n = 2. Then c / 2 is proportional to the number of photons (regardless of frequency in the spectrum?) hitting the detector. It seems like the detector behind the medium will detect photons half as as fast, which in turn seems to imply that somehow the frequency has changed?

Number of photons = c * k1 * t
Number of photons = c / 2 * k1 * t
where k1 is some proportion relating speed of light and number of photons. As time goes on, the difference in photons detected at each receiver will increase.

2. Since the frequency is constant and determined by the emitter, the frequency should not change. Thus, there should be a constant difference of photons detected.

Number of photons = c * k1 * t
Number of photons = c * k1 * (t - delta)
where delta is the constant shift.

Any advice is appreciated.

EDIT: Additionally, I'm not sure how to think about it because light can be thought of as a particle or a wave. Does the particle model apply to radio waves as well?
 
The frequency never changes while passing through a medium - it is always the wavelength.

Radio and light are both electromagnetic waves, so the theory is the same, but have many practical differences.
One is that the index of refraction barely exists for radio waves because almost everything is through air ... hence n=1.

But using light you can use the "optical path length" technique: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_path_length

This should provide your answer.
 
UltrafastPED said:
The frequency never changes while passing through a medium - it is always the wavelength.

Radio and light are both electromagnetic waves, so the theory is the same, but have many practical differences.
One is that the index of refraction barely exists for radio waves because almost everything is through air ... hence n=1.

But using light you can use the "optical path length" technique: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_path_length

This should provide your answer.

What is the description of the mechanism of how the wavelength changes in the medium ?
The geometry was first shown by Huygen : λ2 = λ v/c
I understand that the frequency has to be the same because of the boundary conditions.
So the apparent slowing of light transmission in refraction is because of a shorter wavelength .Im not looking for a geometric optics explanation. Rather the exact physical mechanism at the micro scale in terms of the interaction of the time varying electric field of the EM wave with the electrons in the medium.
 
Last edited:
Would as 'classical' explanation satisfy you? You could think in terms of a distribution of charges with mass, loading the wave in its progress and delaying the perturbations as the wave progresses through the medium as they are forced to oscillate by the impressed varying EM fields and then re radiate a bit later.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K