Understanding Rigid Column Theory in Fluid Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Rigid column theory in fluid mechanics explains the pressure dynamics when a valve is closed and opened. When the valve is closed, pressure rises at the valve, leading to a height increase ΔH above the reservoir pressure. The relationship ΔH = H - Hf is debated, with the driving force being the difference between the head at the entrance and head loss in the pipe. The discussion emphasizes that ΔH indicates flow deceleration when positive and acceleration when negative, depending on valve status. Overall, the treatment of ΔH in the context of fluid dynamics is clarified through equations and diagrams, asserting that the interpretations align with established principles.
axe34
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hello, please see attached text below - this concerns ''rigid column theory''. When a valve is closed, the pressure rises at the valve; the pressure rises above the reservoir pressure by ΔP with a height increase ΔH above H. When the valve is opened, this right hand pressure will disappear and the fluid will start to flow through the open valve.

Why is ΔH = H - Hf?
upload_2017-1-2_9-52-28.png


upload_2017-1-2_9-52-43.png


upload_2017-1-2_9-52-59.png
upload_2017-1-2_9-53-11.png
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So the driving force / ##\left ( {\pi\over 4} d^2 \rho g \right ) \ \ ## ΔH is the head H at the entrance of the pipe minus the head loss in the pipe.
 
I've drawn so many diagrams and simply cannot show that delta H = H - Hf!
 
That a question ?
 
The explanations given in the attached document (the first post in this thread) are poor in my opinion.
Here is how I interpret it: when the valve closes, it seems to imply that a piezometer at the valve with show height H + ΔH
upload_2017-1-5_13-45-15.png


Thus, if we define positive direction to the right,

∑forces on the fluid in horizontal pipe = m.a

(ρgH + ρ0).A - (ρg(H+ΔH) + ρ0).A = ρAL. dv/dt where: ρAL is the mass of fluid in the horizontal pipe and ρ0 is atmospheric pressure (A is pipe cross section)

This gives ΔH = - L/g dv/dt which implies that when delta H is positive, then there will be a deceleration of flow. Similarly, upon valve opening, we will see:
upload_2017-1-5_13-45-44.png

If positive direction still to the right,
∑forces on the fluid in horizontal pipe = m.a

(ρgH + ρ0)A - (ρg(H-ΔH) + ρ0)A = ρAL. dv/dt

thus ΔH = L/g dv/dt which implies that when delta H is as shown on the diagram, then there will be a deceleration of flow. Now, I always though that head loss was as shown in the following diagram:
upload_2017-1-5_13-54-5.png


I've drawn the energy grade line (EGL) and hydraulic grade line (HGL) as the piezometer. ΔH, as defined in diagram 2 on this post is shown in white. Delta H is not equal to H - Hf (Hf also called HL).

upload_2017-1-5_13-49-58.png


So, where have I gone wrong?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-1-5_13-46-27.png
    upload_2017-1-5_13-46-27.png
    22.5 KB · Views: 652
To be honest, I so far only reacted to the part of your question I could recognize (##H_f##). For the pressure surge I have to read up too.
Text says they close the valve gradually, so the stuff keeps flowing. Instead of assuming a linear deceleration as in the link, the book stops with (2.2a), basically ## F = ma ##. So I agree with you, up to and including
axe34 said:
This gives ΔH = - L/g dv/dt which implies that when delta H is positive, then there will be a deceleration of flow.
Note that in fact so far we haven't said anything about the magnitude of ##\Delta H##.
Rememer that ##\Delta H## is a difference.

Upon valve opening, the inital head at he valve is H and the valve has to counter it with a force ##\rho g H A##. Any form of opening the valve lowers the force the valve can exercise on the liquid (the head at the valve), so there is a negative ##\Delta H## available to accelerate the cylinder of liquid.

So imho the baseline for ##\Delta H## in your second picture is the top line and ##\Delta H < 0##.

As such, I see no wrong in the treatment in the text: there are no excessive claims, just manipulation of a few equations.

Your third diagram depicts a steady state: ##{du\over dt}=0## so there is no ##\Delta H##.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top