Understanding Self-Consistent Solutions in Kohn-Sham Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter saray1360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Self
saray1360
Messages
55
Reaction score
1
what does self consistent solution mean in for example Kohn-sham equations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equations of a linear system are consistent if they possesses a common solution, and consistency implies at least one solution.

See - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_of_linear_equations#Consistency

Self-consistency is the condition that F[n(\vec{x})]\,-\,n(\vec{x}) = 0.

See - section 4.4 of http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~muchomas/P480/Notes/dft/dft.pdf
from http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~muchomas/P480/

See also the original Kohn-Sham paper - "Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects," by W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Physical Review 140, A1133-A1138 (1965).
http://www.cem.msu.edu/~cem883/topics_pdf/Kohn_Sham.pdf

and

"Inhomogeneous Electron Gas," by P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Physical Review 136, B864-B871 (1964).
http://prola.aps.org/pdf/PR/v136/i3B/pB864_1

See also Electronic structure By Richard M. Martin

This might also be of interest - KSSOLV—a MATLAB toolbox for solving the Kohn-Sham equations
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1499096.1499099
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It means that on the n-th iteration of the KS loop, the density that you compute from the KS states is equal to the density computed on the (n-1)-th iteration.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top