Understanding Signs of Net Force in Mass-Spring Systems

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the signs of net force in a mass-spring system, particularly how to apply sign conventions when analyzing the forces acting on a mass attached to a spring. The scope includes conceptual clarification and technical explanation related to equilibrium conditions and Hooke's law.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to equate the forces acting on a mass on a spring when considering different sign conventions for the positive direction.
  • Another participant clarifies that at equilibrium, the net force is zero, and discusses how the spring force and gravitational force can be represented with different signs depending on the chosen positive direction.
  • A participant questions the treatment of the minus sign in Hooke's law and whether the spring force should simply be represented as "kx" without considering the sign from Hooke's law.
  • Another response emphasizes that Hooke's law indicates the direction of the restoring force, which is always opposite to the direction of displacement, and that the magnitude is kx, with the sign determined by the chosen coordinate system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the treatment of the signs in Hooke's law and the implications of different sign conventions. There are competing views on how to interpret the forces based on the chosen positive direction.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the implications of sign conventions and the role of Hooke's law in determining force direction, but there are unresolved aspects regarding how to consistently apply these concepts across different scenarios.

chattymatty
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I am having trouble with a simple concept...trying to figure out the signs of net force of a mass on a spring.

I understand that for a mass on the spring, there is a downward force of gravity (mg) and upwards restoring force of the (-kx). How do we equate these, if we regard the positive direction in the same direction as gravity? How would we equate these, if we, in contrast, regard the positive direction in the same direction as the restoring force?

I believe that the final conclusion will be mg = kx. But where are the signs? How did the signs cancel out?

Thank you!
Chatty Matty
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At the equilibrium position, the net force on the mass is zero.

The thing to realize is that regardless of sign convention the spring force acts up (magnitude kx, where x is the distance below the unstretched position) and gravity acts down. What might be throwing you off is the minus sign in Hooke's law: F = -kx. The minus sign just tells you the direction of the restoring force with respect to displacement x. (If x is down, F is up.)

Using up as positive, the spring force is +kx and gravity is -mg. Add them up to get: kx - mg = 0.

Using down as positive, the spring force is -kx and gravity is +mg. Add them: -kx + mg = 0.
 
Hi Doc Al,

When considering the forces, how come we did not consider the minus sign in Hooke's law? So when we consider the spring force (whether we take up or down being positive), is the spring force just "kx"? Depending on the direction we take as positive/negative will dictate then the a +kx or -kx, and not from Hooke's law?

Thanks!
 
Hooke's law tells you the actual direction of the force. (Not by blinding plugging into the equation, but by understanding it.) The force is always opposite to the direction of the stretch (or compression) with respect to the unstretched position. If you pull the spring in one direction, the restoring force points in the opposite direction.

The magnitude of that force is always just kx (where x is taken as positive); the sign that you use depends on the coordinate system and sign convention that you are using.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K