Understanding Solar UV Radiation and Its Impact on Earth: A Brief Overview

AI Thread Summary
Solar UV radiation is not completely blocked from reaching Earth; some wavelengths, particularly those in the hydrogen Lyman series, do penetrate the atmosphere, although most UV is filtered out. Sunburns serve as evidence that a fraction of solar UV reaches the ground. There is a call for more sensitive UV detectors to improve ground-based observations, especially regarding the Lyman Alpha and Lyman Beta profiles. Current data on solar UV is limited, with historical profiles being the best available, but higher resolution measurements are desired to understand variations in these profiles. Understanding UV radiation's impact on Earth is crucial, as it affects both the environment and living organisms.
neilparker62
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
1,191
Reaction score
683
Is solar uv completely blocked from reaching Earth or do we just need more sensitive uv detectors to make ground-based observations? In particular of the uv wavelengths corresponding to hydrogen Lyman series lines.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Sunburns offer compelling evidence that some fraction of solar UV does reach the ground. The atmosphere screens out most, but not all UV radiation. I suspect some radiation at these wavelengths is visible in the Lyman series, but, most is in the Balmer series.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and neilparker62
Chronos said:
Sunburns offer compelling evidence that some fraction of solar UV does reach the ground. The atmosphere screens out most, but not all UV radiation. I suspect some radiation at these wavelengths is visible in the Lyman series, but, most is in the Balmer series.
Thanks - the reason I asked because we've got a whole lot of fancy hardware up in space examining distant stars and galaxies yet the data on our very own special star, the sun is pretty woeful as far as I can make out. I have researched sources of solar Lyman Alpha and Lyman Beta profiles and so far the best I can find is Artzner's 1978 profile and Lyman Beta extracted via 'densitometry' from Tousey's early rocket based observations. I would like to see Artzner's very careful profile at higher resolution. I would like to see what's going on in the small dips you see in left and right peaks. I would like to have a precision measurement of a key reference wavelength namely the geo-coronal absorption rather than seeing attempts to whitewash it out of the picture possibly compromising the profiles. I would also like to see precision measurements on the separation of the peaks in these profiles. Does that vary? Should it vary ? Do we need to be very careful where we measure (ie at disk centre of "quiet sun" rather than in wavy limb filaments or whatever) ?
 
If you're not too clear on how UV radiation affects the Earth and things living on the surface, you should peruse these fact sheets from the US EPA:

http://www.epa.gov/sunwise/doc/uvradiation.html

After all, sun tans do not come solely out of a bottle.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top