Understanding Spin & Angular Momentum

luxiaolei
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
Hi,all

I found myself so hard to turly understand (spin)angular moment, like spin parallel, triplet state, z component of angular moment etc...always mixed them up and confuse myself.
Anyone can help me with understanding these and clarify them would be really helpful.

Q1: Sz spin in z direction in the real space?

Q2:trplet sate has S=1, why one of them is of the form (1/root(2)) (|up down> + |down up>)? its probability or anythingelse? ( I though before, triplet states are parallel and singlet is antiparallel)

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1: I am not sure if i understand your question, but Sz means the spin in z-direction in real-space. but of course, it is up to the definition of z-axis in your system.

Q2: You can operate (S_1+S_2)^2 on the state you have to see if it gives an eigenvalue 1*(1+1). (This is actually a tricky quantum mechanics homework problem. People often forgot how to do it when they have taken the course too many years ago.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top