Understanding Spring Length in the Center-of-Mass Frame

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saitama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the equation for the instantaneous length of a spring in the center-of-mass frame. The confusion arises from the correct formulation of the equation, specifically whether it should be ##r_a'-r_b'-l## or ##r_a'+r_b'-l##. It is clarified that the instantaneous length is defined as ##r_a - r_b##, while ##r_a - r_b - l## represents the instantaneous change in length. The author’s choice to define ##r_b' = r_b - R## is explained as a method to measure distances from the center of mass. This approach is essential for accurate calculations in the center-of-mass frame.
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93
This isn't an homework question. I am trying to understand a solved example in my book. I have attached the solved example.

I am stuck at the point when it says that the instantaneous length of the spring is ##r_a-r_b-l=r_a'-r_b'-l##. I can't figure out how the author got the RHS of the equation. Shouldn't it be ##r_a'+r_b'-l##?

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • two blocks and spring 1.png
    two blocks and spring 1.png
    29.8 KB · Views: 475
  • two blocks and spring 2.png
    two blocks and spring 2.png
    31 KB · Views: 452
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you get
r'a + r'b - L ??

I get the same answer as the book does
 
It follows from the definition that ## r_a - r_b = r_a' - r_b' ##.

However, it is not correct to call ## r_a - r_b - l ## the instantaneous length of the string. The instantaneous length is ## r_a - r_b ##, and ## r_a - r_b - l ## is the instantaneous change in the length.
 
voko said:
It follows from the definition that ## r_a - r_b = r_a' - r_b' ##.

Why did the author define ##r_b'=r_b-R##? Why not ##r_b'=R-r_b##? From the figure, this looks to me the correct equation.
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Why did the author define ##r_b'=r_b-R##? Why not ##r_b'=R-r_b##? From the figure, this looks to me the correct equation.

Because the author wanted to to do things in the center-of-mass frame, with all the distances measured from the C. M. This is plain if you consider all this in the vector form: ## \vec{r}_b = \vec{R} + \vec{r}_b' ##, the vector to point b is the sum of the vector to the C. M. and the vector displacement of point b from the C. M.
 
voko said:
Because the author wanted to to do things in the center-of-mass frame, with all the distances measured from the C. M. This is plain if you consider all this in the vector form: ## \vec{r}_b = \vec{R} + \vec{r}_b' ##, the vector to point b is the sum of the vector to the C. M. and the vector displacement of point b from the C. M.

Thanks a lot voko! :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top