Understanding the Adjoint Operator in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator
AI Thread Summary
The adjoint operator T† is defined mathematically as a unique operator mapping from one Hilbert space back to another, preserving eigenvalues between T and T†. Its physical interpretation relates to the representation of quantum states, where bras and kets denote the states of a system. The adjoint operator assists in the mathematical modeling of quantum mechanics, providing complex conjugate counterparts to state constants. Understanding the adjoint operator can reveal symmetries within quantum systems. This discussion highlights the importance of the adjoint operator in both mathematical and physical contexts in quantum mechanics.
kuan
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

I am right now facing a problem of the adjoint operator.

From the mathematical point of view, if T is a linear operator mapping from Hilbert space H to another Hilbert space H', there exist an unique adjoint operator T^{\dagger} mapping from H' back to H.

However I am right now struggling in understanding the physical meaning of the adjoint operator (not necessarily self-adjoint). The only thing I can think is that the operator T and T^{\dagger} have the same eigenvalues. Does this reveals some kind of symmetry? Could some one give me a bit hint for that?

Many thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For anyone in the future looking at this question, here's the main gist of the definition of an adjoint operator.
Assuming an orthonormal set of bra and ket states, if A is a an operator, then it will have the function

A = \sumi |bi> <ai|
so that when we operate on some state |aj>, we get the corresponding |bj>
A|aj> = |bj>
This is by definition of orthonormality, that <an|an>=1 and <an|am>=0 (same for b).

Meanwhile, for the very same set of states A is the exact definition, with the a and b reversed.
A = \sumi |ai> <bi|


As far as physical interpretation, well, we know that these bras and kets inform us of states of a system. When we observe the system (such as with the momentum operator -i\hbar\frac{d}{dx}), we may find particular eigenvalues and corresponding eigenfunction that serve as a basis of probable outcomes within the set of states. The adjoint operator serves the purpose of assisting in the mathematical representation of the scenario, giving complex conjugates counterparts to state constants.

I'm still a bit in the beginning of a grad course in Quantum I, if anyone can add this, by all means go for it. If I acquire more relevant info from the course/elsewhere later on I will share.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top