MHB Understanding the Constant Field of a Differential Field in $k((x))$

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Field
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I am looking at the following part:

View attachment 5078 The constant field of the differential field $k((x))$ is $k((x^p))$.
Hence if $(1)_p$ has a solution in $k((x))$, multiplication by a suitable constant yields a solution in $k[[x]]$. What exactly is a constant field of a field? (Wondering)
 

Attachments

  • id.PNG
    id.PNG
    37.7 KB · Views: 99
Physics news on Phys.org
Here, they almost surely mean the "functions" in $k((x))$ which are zero under differentiation. In characteristic zero, this would just be $k$, but in characteristic $p$, the monomial $x^p$ differentiates as
\[\frac{d}{dx}x^p = px^{p-1} = 0x = 0.\]
One consequence of this observation is that for any $f(x) \in k((x))$, then
\[\frac{d}{dx}x^pf = px^{p-1}f + x^p \frac{d}{dx}f = x^p\frac{df}{dx}\]
which means that if $f$ is a solution to a linear differential equation, then $x^pf$ will also be a solution to the same equation.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top