MHB Understanding the Constant Field of a Differential Field in $k((x))$

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Field
Click For Summary
The constant field of the differential field k((x)) is identified as k((x^p)), indicating that if (1)_p has a solution in k((x)), a suitable constant multiplication can yield a solution in k[[x]]. The constant field refers to functions in k((x)) that remain unchanged under differentiation, which in characteristic zero is simply k, while in characteristic p, the monomial x^p differentiates to zero. This leads to the conclusion that for any function f(x) in k((x)), the expression x^pf will also be a solution to the same linear differential equation if f is a solution. Understanding these properties is crucial for analyzing differential equations in this context.
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I am looking at the following part:

View attachment 5078 The constant field of the differential field $k((x))$ is $k((x^p))$.
Hence if $(1)_p$ has a solution in $k((x))$, multiplication by a suitable constant yields a solution in $k[[x]]$. What exactly is a constant field of a field? (Wondering)
 

Attachments

  • id.PNG
    id.PNG
    37.7 KB · Views: 104
Physics news on Phys.org
Here, they almost surely mean the "functions" in $k((x))$ which are zero under differentiation. In characteristic zero, this would just be $k$, but in characteristic $p$, the monomial $x^p$ differentiates as
\[\frac{d}{dx}x^p = px^{p-1} = 0x = 0.\]
One consequence of this observation is that for any $f(x) \in k((x))$, then
\[\frac{d}{dx}x^pf = px^{p-1}f + x^p \frac{d}{dx}f = x^p\frac{df}{dx}\]
which means that if $f$ is a solution to a linear differential equation, then $x^pf$ will also be a solution to the same equation.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K