Understanding the Continuity of Real Functions on R^1

AI Thread Summary
For a real function f on R^1, the condition lim [f(x+h)-f(x-h)] = 0 for every x does not guarantee continuity at x. The discussion highlights that while the left-hand limit and right-hand limit may be equal, this does not confirm that they equal f(x). Counterexamples, such as f(x)=0 for x≠0 and f(0)=1, illustrate this point effectively. Participants emphasize that continuity requires the limits to equal the function value at that point. The thread also includes a request for forums on Economics, indicating a shift in the discussion topic.
Ka Yan
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
If f is a real function on R^1, and holds:lim [f(x+h)-f(x-h)] = 0 for every x belongs R^1. Does f continuous?

And I thought it no. Since I considered it mentioned only the left-hand and right-hand limit are equal, but whether or not equal to f(x) was not exactly known.

Will anybody provide me a suggestion? To whether my judgement is true or vice versa.

Thx!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Limit as h->0, right? Then your judgement is correct, though maybe not for the reason you think it is. The easy way to prove it's correct is to present a counterexample. Suppose f(x)=0 for x not equal to zero and f(0)=1.
 
To sharpen your thoughts, let me give another example. Consider the function f(x) = x/x. The RHL = LHL everywhere, but the function itself is not defined at x=0 and so not continuous at that point.
 
Ka Yan said:
Since I considered it mentioned only the left-hand and right-hand limit are equal, but whether or not equal to f(x) was not exactly known.

Hi Ka Yan!

No. Not equal to f(x) (unless f(x) = 0).

Just draw any graph, and look at f(3.1) - f(2.9), f(3.01) - f(2.99), f(3.001) - f(2.999), …

Even the first term, f(3.1) - f(2.9), is nowhere near f(3)! :smile:
™​
 
Thanks a lot, gentlemen!

Erm, may I BTW ask one more away-from-the-point question here? That, could anybody, if possible, provide me of any forums where Economics be discussed? Since I have just started the journey of self-learning of the Micro and Macroeconomics, but found questions nowhere to ask, and no one to discuss with.

I'll thank those who could help me for that favor!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top