Understanding the Continuity of Real Functions on R^1

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of real functions defined on R^1, specifically examining the implications of the limit condition lim [f(x+h)-f(x-h)] = 0 for every x in R^1. Participants explore whether this condition is sufficient for continuity at a point.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of the original poster's assumption regarding continuity based on the limit condition. Some suggest that while the left-hand and right-hand limits are equal, this does not guarantee continuity at the point f(x). Counterexamples are provided to illustrate this point.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing examples and counterexamples to clarify the original poster's understanding. There is a recognition of differing interpretations regarding the implications of the limit condition, but no explicit consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the original poster's reasoning may not align with the established definitions of continuity, and there is a mention of the need for further exploration of the topic. Additionally, the original poster seeks unrelated information about forums for discussing Economics.

Ka Yan
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
If f is a real function on R[tex]^1[/tex], and holds:lim [f(x+h)-f(x-h)] = 0 for every x belongs R[tex]^1[/tex]. Does f continuous?

And I thought it no. Since I considered it mentioned only the left-hand and right-hand limit are equal, but whether or not equal to f(x) was not exactly known.

Will anybody provide me a suggestion? To whether my judgement is true or vice versa.

Thx!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Limit as h->0, right? Then your judgement is correct, though maybe not for the reason you think it is. The easy way to prove it's correct is to present a counterexample. Suppose f(x)=0 for x not equal to zero and f(0)=1.
 
To sharpen your thoughts, let me give another example. Consider the function f(x) = x/x. The RHL = LHL everywhere, but the function itself is not defined at x=0 and so not continuous at that point.
 
Ka Yan said:
Since I considered it mentioned only the left-hand and right-hand limit are equal, but whether or not equal to f(x) was not exactly known.

Hi Ka Yan!

No. Not equal to f(x) (unless f(x) = 0).

Just draw any graph, and look at f(3.1) - f(2.9), f(3.01) - f(2.99), f(3.001) - f(2.999), …

Even the first term, f(3.1) - f(2.9), is nowhere near f(3)! :smile:
™​
 
Thanks a lot, gentlemen!

Erm, may I BTW ask one more away-from-the-point question here? That, could anybody, if possible, provide me of any forums where Economics be discussed? Since I have just started the journey of self-learning of the Micro and Macroeconomics, but found questions nowhere to ask, and no one to discuss with.

I'll thank those who could help me for that favor!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K