Understanding the Convergence Product Theorem in Series Algebra

thesaruman
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
While reading the section about algebra of series of Arfken's essential Mathematical Methods for Physicist, I faced an intriguing demonstration of the product convergence theorem concerning an absolutely convergent series \sum u_n = U and a convergent \sum v_n = V . The autor assured that if the difference
D_n = \sum_{i=0}^{2n} c_i - U_nV_n,
(where c_i is the Cauchy product of both series and U_n and V_n are partial sums) tends to zero as n goes to infinity, the product series converges.
The first thing that came in my mind was the Cauchy criterion for convergence, but then I remembered that i and j should be any integer. So I searched through all the net and my books, and didn't find any close idea.
Where should I search for this? Knopp?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Knopp's book would be one of my first two choices (if you are referring to his big treatise on series). The other is a similar book by Bromwich. I don't have my copy at home so can't give the exact name, but it too is very good.
 
By Abel's theorem if the sum converges it must converge to UV. So this theorem just combines that with the theorem that if a sequence is Cauchy it must converge. I don't know what the i and j you speak of are. The Bromwich book mentioned by statdad is
An Introduction To The Theory Of Infinite Series (1908)
now back in print and downloadable at books.google.com
http://books.google.com/books?id=ZY...+of+Infinite+Series&ie=ISO-8859-1&output=html

see in Bromwich
Article 33 pages 81-84
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much, statdad and lurflurf. I think that I finally understood what the author wanted to say. The product of series presents us to a dramatically new form of seeing the "tails" of the series. By the way, interesting find this google's books. Sorry for my late reply.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top